Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
Now that a sketch has been given of the beliefs and mode of life of
the Ancient Mexicans, it is necessary to deal in some measure with
the remains of their culture scattered over the country. As far as
architecture is concerned, the greater proportion of ruined buildings
must be considered to have been either temples or structures associated
in some way with religion, and perhaps government. The Mexicans
gave of their best to the gods, and though the _corvée_ system
enabled large numbers of men to be employed at one time on works of
considerable magnitude, the rulers seem to have spent more care on
the buildings erected for the service of their deities than on their
own habitations. The peculiar feature of Mexican architecture lies
in the fact that every building of importance was erected upon a
substructure, terrace or truncated pyramid, which, though essentially
secondary in importance to the building or buildings with which it was
crowned, yet represented a vast amount of labour, many hundred times
greater than that expended on the superstructure. This feature has been
unfortunate, in a sense, for Mexican archæology, since the pyramidal
mounds, once the superimposed buildings have disappeared, present
a superficial analogy to the pyramids of Egypt. There can however
be no real comparison, the Egyptian pyramid represented a building
in itself, while the Mexican was in essence a mere accessory. The
foundation-mounds must be distinguished from the mounds of the northern
Pueblo region, which are formed for the most part of the debris
of buildings which have fallen into decay. True foundation-mounds
are rarely found north of a line drawn, roughly, from La Quemada in
Zacatecas to the Gulf of Mexico in the region of the Panuco valley;
but south of it, right down to Honduras, they are a characteristic
feature of architecture. There was a large number of temple pyramids,
of varied dimensions, in Tenochtitlan (Sahagun gives a long list), but
two were of outstanding importance, one in Tenochtitlan proper, the
other in the suburb of Tlaltelolco. Both were so utterly destroyed by
the Spaniards that it is not easy at the present time to fix their
exact position. The most recent, and most successful, attempt to
work out the details of the great Mexican temple from all sources,
literary and archæological, is that of Maudslay, to which reference
can be made by those wishing for more minute particulars (see also
Fig. 12; p. 87). The pyramid, or teocalli, stood at the eastern end of
a large court, about 300 by 350 yards, surrounded by a wall on which
were carved snakes. It was built in five tiers, of earth and stones
faced with masonry; the base measured something over 100 yards, and
the upper surface over 70 yards square. A flight of more than 100
steps on the west side gave access to the summit, and on the eastern
edge of the latter were two shrines, each of two storeys, built, as
seems most probable, chiefly of wood. These two shrines were dedicated
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account