Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
the suggestion that one of the Usumacinta sites may have been named
Tulan, for we do not know the original names of any of them. The net
result of a comparison of the migration legends which we possess is
therefore as follows. The Quiché and Kakchiquel appear to have been
closely connected throughout, and the Tutul Xiu show little trace
of connection with either. The former two tribes seem to have been
brought into contact with the later Nahua, while the Tutul Xiu were
not, and the Tulan from which the Tutul Xiu migration started was not
the Tulan which the Quiché and Kakchiquel regarded as their original
home, though it is possible that the two were intimately connected. The
first stage of Quiché and Kakchiquel migration seems to have been from
west to east, through those districts which, from Tuxpan to Tabasco,
were regarded as the daughter-states of the Mexican Tulan, and their
route, or at any rate some portion of it, lay along the coast. After
this they retraced their steps for a short distance, and then turned
south and west into Guatemala, probably passing through south-western
Vera Cruz, western Oaxaca, and Chiapas. Further consideration of this
complicated question must be deferred until some account has been given
of the religion, ethnography, and ruined sites of the Maya area.
CHAPTER IX--THE MAYA: RELIGION AND MYTH
As among the Mexicans, so too among the Maya, any attempt to
reconstruct their civilization must start with a general survey of
their religious beliefs. The task of dealing shortly and clearly with
this subject is by no means easy; from the one point of view indeed
it is simpler, since the amount of information at the disposal of
students is relatively small; but on the other hand, as far as the
builders of the ruins are concerned, we are dealing with a people who
had had their day at the time of the conquest, and the meaning of the
scenes sculptured on the monuments must be inferred from the religious
practices of a people who, though no doubt ethnically and culturally
their descendants, had been exposed to influences emanating from
Mexico, and had declined in civilization. The different sources of
information, moreover, must be kept distinctly apart; such authorities
as Landa and Cogolludo deal only with the Maya of Yucatan as they found
them; the native traditions called the “Books of Chilan Balam” give a
few mythical details relating to one Yucatec tribe, and that not the
earliest of the Maya immigrants; while other native chroniclers, the
Popol Vuh and Annals of Xahila, relate to the Quiché and Kakchiquel
respectively, also comparatively late immigrants, who had fallen under
Mexican influence. The native codices give a large number of portraits
of beings which, it is safe to conclude, were gods, and these,
especially the manuscript known as Troano-Cortesianus, constitute a
most important link between the early Maya sculptures and the accounts
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account