Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
We come now to the elemental gods, who seem for the most part to have
been rather vague personalities, crystallized here and there (and
rather robbed of dignity in the process) into more sharply defined
tribal protectors. These are the deities whom, I believe, the builders
of the monuments chiefly worshipped, and whose portraits or symbols
may be identified among the carvings which decorate the ruins. Among
these, the most difficult to treat satisfactorily is Kukulkan,
the Quiché Gukumatz. The name, as stated before in connection with
Quetzalcoatl, means “Feathered serpent,” and the conception of such
a divinity is not peculiar to the Maya region, since a feathered
snake, the “Mother of waters,” is worshipped by the Pueblo Indians
far to the north. But Gukumatz-Kukulkan is not a mere water-god, and
I think that his real nature is apparent from the Tzental description
of Kukulkan, “the feathered snake that goes in the waters.” It is
difficult to see what else this can typify than the ripple, born both
of wind and water, the aspect of which suggests feathers, and the
motion a serpent. Both as representing motion, i.e. primordial motion,
and as typifying wind, i.e. breath, the god represents life, and so
in his highest aspect becomes a creator-god. In his snake and water
aspect he is closely connected with the rain-gods, while in his bird
and wind manifestation he is lord of the sky and world-directions,
for the winds blow from all points of the compass. As this great and
vague deity he appears in the early part of the Popol Vuh, and also, I
believe, on the monuments, where his symbol, the serpent-bird, is not
uncommon (e.g. Figs. 48 and 49). But he is not directly represented,
for the very reason that primitive peoples (and civilized too for
that matter) shrink from expressing their high gods in definite form.
It is only when he becomes a tribal protector, as among the Toltec
and the rulers of Mayapan, that his attributes become fixed and a
definite conception of him is transferred to wood or stone. But once
the definite conception is formed, the majesty of mystery is to a large
extent lost, and we see in Mexico the god of life and breath becoming
Eecatl, the god of the material wind, who sweeps the path of the gods
of rain. It is this relation, I believe, that Kukulkan-Gukumatz bears
to the Maya god of the material wind, God K. No one who has studied the
beliefs of the American tribes will think that such a conception is
beyond their psychology. Francisco Hernandez states that the Yucatec
chiefs, that is the more highly educated class, worshipped gods which
were unknown to the populace, and we know that the religious ideas of
the Peruvian rulers were on a very high plane. These higher beliefs,
where they occurred, were usually veiled in symbolism to guard them
from the vulgar; symbolism thrived in America, and the tendency to
esoteric doctrines, evolved by professional priesthoods, adds to the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account