Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
[Illustration: FIG. 54.--Maya month-signs; upper
rows from the monuments; lower rows from the MSS.
A. pop.
B. uo.
C. zip.
D. zotz.
E. tzec.
F. xul.
G. yaxkin.
H. mol.
K. chen.
L. yax.
M. zac.
N. ceh.
O. mac.
P. kankin.
Q. muan.
R. pax.
S. kayab.
T. cumhu.
U. uayeb.]
[Illustration: FIG. 55.--Maya period-signs. Upper
row, face-signs; lower row, normal signs.
A. cycle.
B. katun.
C. tun.
D. uinal.
E. kin.]
Unlike the Mexican months, however, these were used in dating, and a
given day was expressed with its month-sign, together with a numeral to
show which day of the month it was. Thus 6. caban, 5. pop, means the
day 6. caban, after 5 days of the month pop have passed. The numerals
were not expressed on quite the same system as the Mexican. Dots were
used for the numerals up to four, but a bar was used for five, two bars
for ten, and so on, odd days over a multiple of five being expressed by
the requisite number of dots. On the monuments, if the supernumerary
dots were few, the space between or on either side of them was filled
with small crescents, which are merely ornamental and must be
carefully distinguished from the dots themselves. Occasionally in the
more elaborate carvings the numbers from 0 to nineteen are expressed by
faces. In the case of 0 the lower jaw is formed by a hand, and numbers
over ten are expressed by the face assigned to the corresponding unit
but with a fleshless jaw. Ten itself is the head of the death-god. Zero
in the normal notation is expressed either by a hand or a figure shaped
somewhat like a Maltese cross. The use of the zero is explained later.
The Maya, like ourselves, were in the habit of expressing a high number
by a succession of figures which combined to form a numeral, but they
did not employ the decimal system. Their system, when applied to the
computation of time, was on the whole, but not entirely, vigesimal,
and was as follows. Twenty days, or _kin_, formed a _uinal_,
and the uinal thus corresponded to one of their months; but the next
higher unit, the _tun_, consisted of eighteen uinal, and contained
360 days, being thus equivalent to a year _minus_ the five uayeb
days. Twenty tun made a katun (7200 days), and twenty katun went to
another period of which the name is not known, but which is usually
called a cycle (144,000 days). There are indications that a higher
unit still was recognized, the so-called “great cycle,” consisting of
thirteen cycles (1,872,000 days). Each of these periods was expressed
by an appropriate glyph, and these glyphs were in two styles, being
either what is usually termed “normal” signs, or face-signs (Fig. 55).
The latter exhibit considerable variation, especially that of the great
cycle; but the cycle bird-face is recognizable by the jaw-bone in the
shape of a hand (recalling the face-paint of the Mexican gods into
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account