Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
own system of dating, at any rate with any degree of certainty, for the
reason that the position of their starting-point, 4. ahau, 8. cumhu, is
not fixed. But this is a subject to which I shall return later (p. 360.)
As in Mexico, so among the Maya, the importance of the calendar from
the religious point of view, and the close connection between religion
and agriculture, gave the priesthood enormous influence throughout
the country. According to Landa, a high-priest of the Yucatec was
called Ahkin Mai, or Ahaukan Mai; his office was hereditary, and he
was succeeded in it by a son or near relation. A less exalted rank was
held by the Chilan, or oracular priests, who declared the will of the
gods, and performed the functions of diviners and doctors. As might
be expected, these functionaries enjoyed great respect, and rarely
went abroad except in a litter. The Nacon were officials whose duties
were partly sacerdotal and partly military. In their first capacity,
as the sacrificing priests, they held office perpetually, but there
was also a military aspect to this office, since the commander of the
fighting forces was elected from among the Nacon, and held the position
for three years. Other priests, who performed definite functions as
assistants in certain ceremonies, were called Chac, and seem to have
been to some extent the representatives of the Bacabs, since four
officiated at once. Priests generally were called Ahkin, and the local
clergy were nominated by the high-priest after examination in ritual
and “science,” i.e. divination, writing and calendrical interpretation.
The priesthood at large educated candidates for admission to their
order, including also the younger sons of chiefs, who often “entered
the church.” They lived in buildings close to the temples, and there
were similar religious houses for the accommodation of celibate “nuns”
who were under the protection of a “mother superior.” Any lapse from
chastity on their part was punished with death, but any of the inmates
might leave the establishment by permission and marry, just as in
Mexico. It is probable that the buildings other than temples which
survive in the ruined cities are either the residences of princes or
religious establishments of this nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive