Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
In the Popol Vuh even clearer indications of this are given, and it
is evident that the authority of Balam-Quitzé, Balam-Agab, Mahucutah
and Iqi-Balam rested on the fact that they were the guardians and
high-priests of the gods given to them at Tulan. The association
between priest and god in this case seems to have been personal and
not transferable, for their sons do not immediately succeed to their
positions. In fact, the legend seems to indicate the substitution of a
more secular form of authority, since the titles and _insignia_
of power are sought and obtained from a people living to the east,
though these titles and _insignia_, not unnaturally, are conferred
upon the elder sons of the deceased leaders. The titles include that
of Ahpop, afterwards held by supreme chiefs, and the _insignia_
consist of canopy, throne, musical instruments, pigments, perfumes,
animal head-dresses, heron-plumes and shell and other ornaments,
many of which appear in the livery worn by the figures sculptured on
the early Maya monuments. The power of the rulers grew, centres of
authority, similar to Mayapan, but probably on a smaller scale, were
formed, and tribute of gems, gold, feathers and honey was imposed
upon the conquered tribes. In particular we are told that the ruling
people grew rich upon the bride-prices paid by the suitors of their
women, and it may be concluded that alliances with a princely house
were as much sought in Guatemala as in Mexico, and that the belief,
that rank could only be conferred by an individual in whose blood it
was inherent, was equally prevalent. The Popol Vuh gives a list of the
principal officers of the Quiché state, and those of the Cavek division
are quoted below. Nothing is known concerning them save the probable
translation of the titles, but they will serve to indicate the nature
of the Quiché constitution, which may well have been founded on some
system prevailing among the earlier Maya. The translations are those of
Brinton.
Ahau-Ahpop, the ruler.
Ahau-Ahpop-Camha, possibly the sub-chief of the Tziquinaha.
Ah-Tohil, the high-priest of Tohil.
Ah-Gukumatz, the high-priest of Gukumatz.
Nim-Chokoh-Cavek, the heir of the first.
Popol-Vinak-Chituy, the high councillor of Chituy.
Lolmet-Quehney, the overseer of tribute.
Popol-Vinak-Pa-Hom-Tzalatz, the councillor of the ball-game.
Uchuch-Camha, the high steward.
In a later passage a functionary called Tepeu-Yaqui, who may have been
the chief sacrificer, is substituted for the last. All these officials
are described as “lords of great houses.” The other divisions of the
Quiché were organized on similar principles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account