Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
[Illustration: FIG. 63.--Priests with musical
instruments.
(_Dresden MS._) (_After Seler_)]
As regards games, beans were thrown as dice, but the most interesting
amusement was the ball-game, called tlaxtli by the Mexicans, and played
in the same manner. In the Popol Vuh the outfit of the ball-player,
which the rat discovers for Hunahpu and Xbalanque, is said to consist
of “hip-shields, rings, gauntlets, crowns and helmets.” By far the
finest example of a tlaxtli-court known is at Chichen Itza, and the
semi-religious nature of the game is illustrated by the fact that a
temple is attached to it. Before a court could be used it was formally
consecrated; at midnight, on a lucky day, two idols, one of the game,
the other of the ball, were set up on the lower walls of the court,
and certain ceremonies took place, including the blessing of the court
itself. Finally the ball was thrown four times as in the game, and the
court was then considered consecrated and could be used by the players.
The game was played for stakes, such as a bundle of cotton cloths, gold
ornaments, or feathers, and a peculiar rule existed in accordance with
which the player who was fortunate enough to send the ball through
the ring, a feat which was but rarely performed, could claim all the
cloaks of the spectators. Now it is an interesting fact that remains
of tlaxtli-courts are not found elsewhere in the Maya country except
at Chacula and Alta Vera Paz in the west of Guatemala, where they are
exactly similar to those in the Zapotec region at Quiengola. Moreover,
the ball-court at Chichen Itza belongs to the later buildings, since
the temples attached to it are ornamented in Toltec style, the figures
do not exhibit head-deformation, and the reliefs include glyphs of a
non-Maya character. I think it is fair to assume that the game was not
played by the builders of the earlier monuments, but was introduced in
later times from Mexico. I believe that the Popol Vuh gives a hint of
its introduction. It will be remembered that the heroes Hun Hunahpu
and Vukub Hunahpu give offence to the people of Xibalba by playing the
game. “Their game is an insult to us,” are the words used, and they
are forthwith challenged to a contest. But before they are allowed
to engage in competition, they are submitted to a number of tests, a
fact which seems to indicate that they were called upon to prove their
acquaintance with certain mysteries peculiar to the tribe. Failing in
these, they are put to death without being permitted to engage in the
game. The idea that certain games are the property of certain tribes is
not unfamiliar to students of ethnography, especially in the case of
games which possess the ceremonial significance which is so noticeable
a feature of tlaxtli. The tests therefore which the lords of Xibalba
impose upon the heroes have the object of discovering whether the
latter possess the right to play the game which they claim, and it will
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account