Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
As regards the arrangement of buildings it is impossible to discuss
in detail the ground-plans of the various sites, but attention may
be called to the prevailing tendency to group the most important
structures round square or rectangular courts. Beyond this, little
community of plan is observed, and indeed in the central area the
builders were often obliged to suit their arrangement to the exigencies
of the site. Thus Palenque and Copan, being built in river-valleys,
exhibit less regularity of arrangement than such sites as Tikal, where
the country is more or less of a plain. There is evidence too that
many of the cities grew by accretion beyond the limits intended by the
first builders, and this fact will explain much of the irregularity
observable in plan. But throughout, the assemblage of buildings round
a court is a prominent feature, and the court would seem to have been
the unit of growth (see Pl. XXVI, 2; p. 338). It is a noticeable
fact that none of the sites in the east and centre of the Maya area
exhibit any defensive qualities. The courts are open at the corners,
and the sites selected for building are evidently not chosen with
any strategic insight. In the west, however, the case is somewhat
different, and we find settlements, such as Iximché and Utatlan, built
as it were on peninsulas almost surrounded by inaccessible barrancas
and connected with the “mainland” only by a narrow neck which could be
easily defended by a mere handful of men. This fact goes far towards
indicating that the ruins in the centre were centres of religious and
ceremonial life rather than cities in the modern sense of the word.
The question as to how far Maya buildings were definitely oriented is
rather complex. On the whole far fewer indications of the practice
occur in the Maya region than in the Mexican. To speak generally the
sites at Seibal and in southern Yucatan, as far as surveyed, are
more carefully oriented than in northern Yucatan and elsewhere. The
buildings at Copan are not oriented, but here and at such sites as
Palenque, the surrounding hills and forests obscure the true horizon,
and the arrangement of courts may yet be found to square with the
apparent point of rising of certain heavenly bodies. An accurate survey
of Tikal would throw a good deal of light upon the problem, since the
situation of the ruins in comparatively level country, combined with
the great height of the pyramids, would have enabled the inhabitants to
obtain a far truer horizon than at most sites.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account