Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
north, at Tulan (_h_); and in the Huaxtec country, at Teayo (_f_).
The sign moreover bears a close analogy to that by which the Aztec
expressed the period of a year (_l_), and the triangular portion of
it is exactly similar to a conventional sun-ray. It is perhaps worth
noting that at Copan, Uxmal and Teayo it is associated with the head
of the rain-god. The significance of this symbol is obscure, but its
presence over so large an area can hardly be due to coincidence.
[Illustration: FIG. 86.--Details from various
monuments showing the interlaced head-ornament.
_a._ Copan, stela 6.
_b._ Piedras Negras.
_c._ Menché.
_d._ Tehuacan.
_e._ Xochicalco.
_f._ Teayo.
_g._ Uxmal.
_h._ Tulan.
_k._ Tenango.
_l._ The Mexican year-sign. (_Zouche MS._)
_m._ Island of Xico.]
I think it is obvious from what has gone before, that the Aztec may
be left out of account in any consideration of the source of such
similarities as may be traced in Mexican and Mayan culture. They were
admittedly late immigrants, from the north, into the Mexican valley,
and were, at the time of their arrival, in a very low state of culture;
moreover, as stated above, it is the pre-Aztec remains which show the
closest relation to the Mayan. The question therefore resolves itself
into an enquiry which was the earlier, the culture exemplified in
the ruins of the central Maya area, or that which gave birth to the
pre-Aztec remains at such early valley sites as Tulan, Teotihuacan and
Azcapotzalco? Any solution of this question must also fix the relation
of Oaxaca to both, and account for the Huaxtec, a Maya-speaking people
whose sculptures bear no trace of a hieroglyphic script. Included
in this question is that of the origin of the calendar. Let me say
at once that the evidence at our disposal is not sufficient to
permit these questions to be answered with certainty. Much patient
excavation, both in the Mexican valley and in the central Mayan region,
is necessary before the origin of the pre-Spanish civilization can
be traced with any degree of finality; but I think it is possible to
put forward a working theory, which must of necessity be modified
in accordance with future researches, but which may at least be of
service to critics as an invitation to concentrate their minds upon the
subject. It is solely with this idea that I have ventured to draw up a
scheme of dating (see Appendix III), and I will deal with this first,
pointing out its weaknesses with as much impartiality as possible.
[Illustration:
_PLATE XXX_
_Photo. Guerra_
MAYA
THE “HOUSE OF THE GOVERNOR,” UXMAL, YUCATAN]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account