Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
When we come to consider the Mixtec and Zapotec, we find inhumation
the rule, indeed the Zapotec abhorred cremation, considering it
destructive of the soul. Nor was the method always simple inhumation,
but secondary burial. The body was placed in the ground with feet to
the east, and the bones were collected subsequently and placed in a
vase which was deposited in a stone vault in a mound, the doorway being
closed with a sculptured slab (Fig. 15). Both peoples also employed
caves to some extent as receptacles of the dead. Simple inhumation
in caves seems to have been more common among the Mixtec than the
Zapotec, and Burgoa writes of cave burials at Chalcatongo, supposed to
be the gate of paradise, where the dead were laid out dressed in rich
garments, numbers of small idols in gold, stone and wood being placed
in niches in the cave-walls. The same author tells of the Zapotec kings
being deposited at Mitla, in a chamber in one of the temples, clad in
gorgeous ornaments and holding shield and spear. It is possible that
primary burial was reserved for those of high rank.
[Illustration: FIG. 16.--Carved stone slab from
Placeres del Oro, Guerrero.]
An extremely interesting burial has been found at a place called
Placeres del Oro, in the valley of the Rio del Oro, a southern
tributary of the Rio de las Balsas. The chief interest of the remains
here found lies in the very peculiar art of the sculptured slabs
between which the bones were deposited (Fig. 16). The walls of the
grave, which was situated at the foot of a mound, were of clay hardened
by fire, and of the bones themselves it is said “there is good reason
to suspect that at least partial cremation of the body took place at
the time this burial was made.” This is a most important point, and
ought to be definitely settled by careful inspection of the bones. The
site is on the debatable land between Nahua, Tarascan and Zapotec,
and there are reasons, which will be given later, why I think it most
probable, failing definite evidence to the contrary, that the body had
not been burnt.
The fine stone coffer from the Huaxtec country shown on Pl. X, 2; p.
108, is almost certainly a coffin; and in the Totonac country both
cist-burial in mounds and, occasionally, well-burial are found. Traces
of cremation appear to be exceptional, and confined to hill-sites
inland, where they are perhaps indicative of Nahua influence.
[Illustration:
_PLATE X_
HUAXTEC
1. STONE FIGURE; PANUCO RIVER
2. „ CHEST; „ „]
[Illustration: MAYA
3. POTTERY CENSER; BRITISH HONDURAS
(Scale: 1, ⅒th; 2, ⅛th; 3, ⅕th)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account