Mexican letters written during the progress of the late war between the United States and Mexico, no. 1.Brackenridge, H. M. (Henry Marie)
History
Mexican letters written during the progress of the late war between the United States and Mexico, no. 1.
Brackenridge, H. M. (Henry Marie)
Mexican War, 1846-1848; United States -- Politics and government -- 1845-1849
It must be admitted, that Santa Anna, however detestable his
character, has displayed great military talent. He led his
troops to battle under circumstances, he was well aware, would
cause them to fight with desperation. They were not only filled
with confidence from their immense superiority of numbers, but
rendered desperate by hunger and the hope of booty, which he had
promised them, and which supplied the want of higher motives of
action, such as inspired the superior race with which they had
to contend. In the words of Byron:
“Th’Assyrian came down like a wolf on the plain,”
but the shepherd was prepared to receive him, and drive him back
howling to the desert. The sudden retreat of General Taylor from
his advanced position to his chosen battle ground, no doubt
unexpected, must have had the effect of disconcerting the enemy.
By thus meeting him at the edge of the desert, he availed
himself, like a skilful commander, of all the advantages of
circumstances. What events the war may bring forth, if it should
continue, it is impossible to foretell, but it is certain, that
the series of victories which have been thus far achieved by
him, have not been surpassed in our military history, while that
of Buena Vista, stands unequalled.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LETTER 14.
_Shall we organize Territorial Governments in the conquered
Territories._
MARCH, 1847.
Both political parties seem to take it for granted, that
annexation must immediately follow the conquest of the whole or
any portion of Mexico, by which is meant, the formation of new
States to be added to the confederacy. But this is by no means a
necessary consequence. Louisiana was not brought within the pale
of the Constitution for eight years, Missouri for a longer time,
and Florida for sixteen. They were placed under a first, and
then a second grade of territorial government, over which the
Constitution was not extended; rather their Courts, executive,
judicial, or legislative branches, were not constitutional
authorities, but depending on Congress for their being and
power. It has been argued, that the acquisition of territory,
either by purchase or conquest, (to which the same reason
applies,) is not constitutional; and of this opinion, were Mr.
Jefferson, John Quincy Adams, and I think I may add, Mr.
Madison. But public opinion, and public necessity, have
overruled them, not by fair reasoning, but by “jumping to the
conclusion.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account