Mexican letters written during the progress of the late war between the United States and Mexico, no. 1.Brackenridge, H. M. (Henry Marie)
History
Mexican letters written during the progress of the late war between the United States and Mexico, no. 1.
Brackenridge, H. M. (Henry Marie)
Mexican War, 1846-1848; United States -- Politics and government -- 1845-1849
The only acts of Congress extended to the territories are always
expressly named, and they are those relating to the revenue, the
slave trade, those regulating commerce and the public lands;
while the great body of the acts of Congress, have application
only to the members of the confederacy. The general Government,
in virtue of its sovereignty, had the control over all foreign
intercourse, and undertook the military defence and protection.
Having lived under these protective Governments, I must candidly
confess, that they possess many advantages. They are entirely
unlike the condition of colonies and conquered provinces,
subject to onerous exactions, or restrictions. Their burthens
were even lighter than those of the citizens of the States, in
consequence of not being represented in Congress, as it would be
against a fundamental principle to bind them by laws, which they
had no share in enacting. Many of the territorial inhabitants
regret the change from the quiet of their territorial
Government, to the turbulence and expense of the State
constitution. They preferred this state of things to the
ambition of being able to disturb the balance of power among the
States, by a voice in the Senate, or even in the House of
Representatives. But the admission into the Union (or admission
as States,) “as soon as consistent with the principles of the
Constitution,” was an express stipulation, under the treaties
which ceded those territories; and in the case of Texas,
immediate annexation as a State, was the principal consideration
of the compact. Where there is no such stipulation, as in the
case of countries acquired by conquest, like those of the Rio
Grande, the acquisition is unconditional, and the territorial
state may be continued indefinitely, or the admission of the
whole or part, be determined at our pleasure. According to the
laws of nations, their local laws remain in force; and according
to our Constitution, Congress has no power to legislate in local
matters for them, although it may create a local legislature for
that purpose; for, in my opinion, it cannot constitute itself a
local legislature for the purpose, as in the anomalous case of
the District of Columbia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account