The speculation above referred to is of such intrinsic importance, in
view of the developments of the last decade, that it compels further
notice. Faraday himself further expanded it in a letter to Richard
Phillips, which was printed in the _Philosophical Magazine_ for May,
1846, under the title “Thoughts on Ray-vibrations.” In this avowedly
speculative paper Faraday touched the highest point in his scientific
writings, and threw out, though in a tentative and fragmentary way,
brilliant hints of that which his imagination had perceived, as in
a vision;--the doctrine now known as the electromagnetic theory of
light. At the dates when the earlier biographies of Faraday appeared,
neither that doctrine nor this paper had received the recognition due
to its importance. Tyndall dismisses it as “one of the most singular
speculations that ever emanated from a scientific man.” Bence Jones
just mentions it in half a line. Dr. Gladstone does not allude to it.
It therefore seems expedient to give here some extracts from the letter
itself:--
THOUGHTS ON RAY-VIBRATIONS.
_To Richard Phillips, Esq._
DEAR SIR,--At your request, I will endeavour to convey to you a
notion of that which I ventured to say at the close of the last
Friday evening meeting ...; but, from first to last, understand
that I merely threw out, as matter for speculation, the vague
impressions of my mind, for I gave nothing as the result of
sufficient consideration, or as the settled conviction, or even
probable conclusion at which I had arrived.
The point intended to be set forth for the consideration
of the hearers was whether it was not possible that the
vibrations--which in a certain theory are assumed to account
for radiation and radiant phenomena--may not occur in the lines
of force which connect particles, and consequently masses, of
matter together--a notion which, as far as it is admitted, will
dispense with the æther, which, in another view, is supposed to
be the medium in which these vibrations take place.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account