In 1851, from July to December, Faraday was actively at work in the
laboratory. The results constitute the material for the twenty-eighth
and twenty-ninth (the last) series of the “Experimental Researches.”
In these he returned to the subject with which the first series had
opened in 1831: the induction of electric currents by the relative
motion of magnets and conducting wires. These two memoirs, together
with his Royal Institution lecture of January, 1852, “On the Lines of
Magnetic Force,” and the paper “On the Physical Character of the Lines
of Magnetic Force” (which he sent to the _Philosophical Magazine_, as
containing “so much of a speculative and hypothetical nature”), should
be read, and re-read, and read again, by every student of physics.
They are reprinted at the end of the third volume of the “Experimental
Researches.”
In the opening of the twenty-eighth memoir he says:--
From my earliest experiments on the relation of electricity and
magnetism, I have had to think and speak of lines of magnetic
force as representations of the magnetic power--not merely in
the points of quality and direction, but also in quantity....
The direction of these lines about and amongst magnets and
electric currents is easily represented and understood in a
general manner by the ordinary use of iron filings.
A point equally important to the definition of these lines
is, that they represent a determinate and unchanging amount
of force. Though, therefore, their forms, as they exist
between two or more centres or sources of power, may vary very
greatly, and also the space through which they may be traced,
yet the sum of power contained in any one section of a given
portion of the lines is exactly equal to the sum of power in
any other section[54] of the same lines, however altered in
form or however convergent or divergent they may be at the
second place.... Now, it appears to me that these lines may
be employed with great advantage to represent the nature,
condition, and comparative amount of the magnetic forces,
and that in many cases they have, to the physical reasoner,
at least, a superiority over that method which represents
the forces as concentrated in centres of action, such as the
poles of magnets or needles; or some other methods, as, for
instance, that which considers north or south magnetisms as
fluids diffused over the end, or amongst the particles, of a
bar. No doubt any of these methods which does not assume too
much will, with a faithful application, give true results. And
so they all ought to give the same results, as far as they can
respectively be applied. But some may, by their very nature, be
applicable to a far greater extent, and give far more varied
results, than others. For, just as either geometry or analysis
may be employed to solve correctly a particular problem, though
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account