On one occasion he commented rather sarcastically upon the British
Government and its stinginess as compared with those of all other
civilised countries in its aids to scientific progress. This complaint
is equally justified to-day. To many it may be news that England pays
to its Astronomer Royal--who must obviously be a person of very high
scientific qualifications--a salary less than those paid to the five
assistant under-secretaries in the Colonial and Foreign Offices; less
than that paid to the sergeants-at-arms in the Houses of Parliament;
less than that paid to the person appointed Director of Clothing in the
War Office. Enlightened England!
Faraday did not deem the pursuit of science to be necessarily
incompatible with what he termed “professional business”--that
is, expert work. Until the day when he abandoned all professional
engagements, so as to devote himself to researches, he had been
receiving a considerable and growing income from this source. But
he objected to the indignities to which this work exposed him from
lawyers, who would not understand that he took no partisan view. He
could not endure the browbeating of cross-examining counsel. The late
Lord Cardwell was witness to a gentle but crushing reproof which he
once administered to a barrister who attempted to bully him. A writer
in the _British Quarterly Review_ attributes to a specific case his
determination to cease expert work.
He gave evidence once in a judicial case, when the scientific
testimony, starting from given premises, was so diverse that
the presiding judge, in summing up launched something like a
reproach at the scientific witnesses. “Science has not shone
this day,” was his lordship’s remark. From that time forth
no one ever saw Faraday as a scientific witness before a law
tribunal.
[Sidenote: UNIVERSITY DEGREES IN SCIENCE.]
Amongst the honours received by Faraday there was one of which,
in 1838, he said that he felt it equal to any other he had
received--namely, that of Member of the Senate of the University of
London, to which position he was nominated in 1836 by the Crown. For
twenty-seven years he remained a senator, and when, in 1859, the
project for creating degrees in science was on foot, he was one of
the committee who drew up a report and scheme of examination for the
Senate. To the Rev. John Barlow he wrote on this matter:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account