An iron cylinder had a helix wound on it. The ends of the wires
of the helix were connected with the indicating helix at a
distance by copper wire. Then the iron placed between the poles
of bar magnets as in accompanying figure (Fig. 5). Every time
the magnetic contact at N or S was made or broken, there was
magnetic motion at the indicating helix--the effect being, as
in former cases, not permanent, but a mere momentary push or
pull. But if the electric communication (_i.e_. by the copper
wire) was broken, then the disjunction and contacts produced no
effect whatever. Hence here distinct conversion of magnetism
into electricity.
The fourth day of work was October 1. Paragraphs 36, 37, and 38
describe the discovery of induced voltaic currents:--
36. A battery of ten troughs, each of ten pairs of plates four
inches square, charged with good mixture of sulphuric and
nitric acid, and the following experiments made with it in the
following order.
37. One of the coils (of a helix of copper wire 203 feet long)
was connected with the flat helix, and the other (coil of same
length round same block of wood) with the poles of the battery
(it having been found that there was no metallic contact
between the two); the magnetic needle at the indicating flat
helix was affected, but so little as to be hardly sensible.
38. In place of the indicating helix, our galvanometer was
used, and then a sudden jerk was perceived when the battery
communication was _made_ and _broken_, but it was so slight as
to be scarcely visible. It was one way when made, the other
when broken, and the needle took up its natural position at
intermediate times.
Hence there is an inducing effect without the presence of iron,
but it is either very weak or else so sudden as not to have
time to move the needle. I rather suspect it is the latter.
The fifth day of experiment was October 17. Paragraph 57 describes the
discovery of the production of electricity by the approximation of a
magnet to a wire:--
A cylindrical bar magnet three-quarters of an inch in
diameter, and eight inches and a half in length, had one end
just inserted into the end of the helix cylinder (220 feet
long); then it was quickly thrust in the whole length, and the
_galvanometer_ needle moved; then pulled out, and again the
_needle moved_, but in the opposite direction. This effect was
repeated every time the magnet was put in or out, and therefore
a wave of electricity was so produced from _mere approximation
of a magnet_, and not from its formation _in situ_.
The cause of all the earlier failures was, then, that both magnet and
coil were at rest. The magnet might lie in or near the coil for a
century and cause no effect. But while moving towards the coil, or from
it, or by spinning near it, electric currents were at once induced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account