Michael Faraday: Third Edition, with PortraitGladstone, J. H. (John Hall)
Science
Michael Faraday: Third Edition, with Portrait
Gladstone, J. H. (John Hall)
Faraday, Michael, 1791-1867
"I am always glad to hear of the progress of your researches, and
never the less so because they require the fabrication of a new word
or two. Such a coinage has always taken place at the great epochs of
discovery; like the medals that are struck at the beginning of a new
reign, or rather like the change of currency produced by the accession
of a new Sovereign; for their value and influence consists in their
coming into common circulation."
* * * * *
During the whole time of an investigation Faraday had kept ample notes,
and when all was completed he had little to do but to copy these notes,
condensing or re-arranging some parts, and omitting what was useless.
The paper then usually consisted of a series of numbered paragraphs,
containing first a statement of the subject of inquiry, then a series
of experiments giving negative results, and afterwards the positive
discoveries. In this form it was sent to the Royal Society or some
other learned body. Yet this often involved considerable labour, as the
following words written to Miss Moore in 1850 from a summer retreat in
Upper Norwood will show:--"I write and write and write, until nearly
three papers for the Royal Society are nearly completed, and I hope
that two of them will be good if they do justify my hopes, for I have
to criticise them again and again before I let them loose. You shall
hear of them at some of the next Friday evenings."
This criticism did not cease with their publication, for he endeavoured
always to improve on his previous work. Thus, in 1832 he bound his
papers together in one volume, and the introduction on the fly-leaf
shows the object with which it was done:--
"Papers of mine, published in octavo, in the _Quarterly Journal of
Science_, and elsewhere, since the time that Sir H. Davy encouraged me
to write the analysis of caustic lime.
"Some, I think (at this date), are good, others moderate, and some
bad. But I have put _all_ into the volume, because of the utility they
have been of to me--and none more than the bad--in pointing out to me
in future, or rather after times, the faults it became me to watch and
to avoid.
"As I never looked over one of my papers a year after it was written,
without believing, both in philosophy and manner, it could have been
much better done, I still hope the collection may be of great use to
me.
"M. FARADAY.
"_August 18, 1832_."
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account