Michael Faraday: Third Edition, with PortraitGladstone, J. H. (John Hall)
Science
Michael Faraday: Third Edition, with Portrait
Gladstone, J. H. (John Hall)
Faraday, Michael, 1791-1867
"M. FARADAY."
As an instance of his unwillingness to commit himself to an opinion
unless he was sure about it, may be cited a letter he wrote to Sir
G. B. Airy, the Astronomer Royal, who asked for his advice in regard
to the material of which the national standard of length should be
made:--"I do not see any reason why a pure metal should be particularly
free from internal change of its particles, and on the whole should
rather incline to the hard alloy than to soft copper, and yet I hardly
know why. I suppose the labour would be too great to lay down the
standard on different metals and substances; and yet the comparison of
them might be very important hereafter, for twenty years seem to _do_
or _tell_ a great deal in relation to standard measures." Bronze was
finally chosen.
SECTION V.
THE VALUE OF HIS DISCOVERIES.
Science is pursued by different men from different motives.
"To some she is the goddess great;
To some the milch-cow of the field;
Their business is to calculate
The butter she will yield."
Now, Faraday had been warned by Davy before he entered his service that
Science was a mistress who paid badly; and in 1833 we have seen him
deliberately make his calculation, give up the butter, and worship the
goddess.
For the same reason also he declined most of the positions of honour
which he was invited to fill, believing that they would encroach too
much on his time, though he willingly accepted the honorary degrees and
scientific distinctions that were showered upon him.[25]
And among those who follow Science lovingly, there are two very
distinct bands: there are the philosophers, the discoverers, men who
persistently ask questions of Nature; and there are the practical men,
who apply her answers to the various purposes of human life. Many
noble names are inscribed in either bead-roll, but few are able to
take rank in both services: indeed, the question of practical utility
would terribly cramp the investigator, while the enjoyment of patient
research in unexplored regions of knowledge is usually too ethereal
for those who seek their pleasures in useful inventions. The mental
configuration is different in the two cases; each may claim and receive
his due award of honour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account