And that this was the surface of the Air that gave so vivid a _re-percussion_ I try’d by this means I sunk half of a _stiria_ in Water, so that only Water was contiguous to the under surface, and then the internal reflection was so exceedingly faint, that it was scarce discernable. Again, I try’d to alter this vivid reflection by keeping off the Air, with a body not fluid, and that was by rubbing and holding my finger very hard against the under surface, so as in many places the pulp of my finger did touch the Glass, without any _interjacent_ air between, then observing the reflection, I found, that wheresoever my finger or skin toucht the surface, from that part there was no reflection, but in the little furrows or creases of my skin, where there remain’d little small lines of air, from them was return’d a very vivid reflection as before. I try’d further, by making the surface of very pure Quicksilver to be contiguous to the under surface of this _pellucid_ body, and then the reflection from that was so exceedingly more vivid than from the air, as the reflection from air was than the reflection from the Water; from all which trials I plainly saw, that the strong reflecting air was the cause of this _Phænomenon_. And this agrees very well with the _Hypothesis_ of light and _Pellucid_ bodies which I have mention’d in the description of _Muscovy-glass_; for we there suppose Glass to be a _medium_, which does less resist the pulse of light, and consequently, that most of the Rays incident on it enter into it, and are refracted towards the _perpendicular_; whereas the air I suppose to be a body that does more resist it, and consequently more are _re-percuss’d_ then do enter it: the same kind of trials have I made, with _Crystalline Glass_, with drops of fluid bodies, and several other ways, which do all seem to agree very exactly with this _Theory_. So that from this Principle well establish’d, we may deduce severall Corollaries not unworthy observation. And the first is; that it plainly appears by this, that the production of the Rainbow is as much to be ascribed to the reflection of the concave surface of the air, as to the refraction of the _Globular_ drops: this will be evidently manifest by these Experiments, if you _foliate_ that part of a Glass-ball that is to reflect an _Iris_, as in the _Cartesian_ Experiment, above mention’d, the reflections will be abundantly more strong, and the colours more vivid: and if that part of the surface be touch’d with Water, scarce affords any sensible colour at all.