7. Whether the appearance of the _Pike_ of _Tenerif_, and several other high Mountains, at so much greater a distance then seems to agree with their respective heights, be not to be attributed to the _Curvature_ of the visual Ray, that is made by its passing obliquely through so differingly _Dense_ a Medium from the top to the eye very far distant in the Horizon: For since we have already, I hope, made it very probable, that there is such an _inflection_ of the Rays by the differing density of the parts of the Air; and since I have found, by several Experiments made on places comparatively not very high, and have yet found the pressure sustain’d by those parts of the Air at the top and bottom, and also their differing Expansions very considerable: Insomuch that I have found the pressure of the _Atmosphere_ lighter at the top of St. _Paul_’s Steeple in _London_ (which is about two hundred foot high) then at the bottom by a sixtieth or fiftieth part, and the expansion at the top greater then that at the bottom by neer about so much also; for the _Mercurial Cylinder_ at the bottom was about 39. inches, and at the top half an inch lower; the Air also included in the Weather-glass, that at the bottom fill’d only 155. spaces, at the top fill’d 158. though the heat at the top and bottom was found exactly the same with a scal’d _Thermometer_: I think it very rational to suppose, that the greatest Curvature of the Rays is made nearest the Earth, and that the inflection of the Rays, above 3. or 4. miles upwards, is very inconsiderable, and therefore that by this means such calculations of the height of Mountains, as are made from the distance they are visible in the Horizon, from the supposal that that Ray is a straight Line (that from the top of the Mountain is, as ’twere, a Tangent to the Horizon whence it is seen) which really is a _Curve_, is very erroneous. Whence, I suppose, proceeds the reason of the exceedingly differing Opinions and Assertions of several Authors, about the height of several very high Hills.