Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the RenaissanceJacob, P. L.
History
Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the Renaissance
Jacob, P. L.
Europe -- Social life and customs; Manners and customs -- History; Middle Ages; Renaissance
Prior to the fifth century, the clergy were obliged to wear no
distinctive dress in private life. As in the days of the Apostles,
the bishops, the priests, the clerks, the deacons, and the choristers
wore tunics and sandals, as prescribed by the Saviour in the Gospel
of St. Mark (vi. 9). They covered themselves with a square piece of
black or brown cloth, which was draped around the figure, and was
fastened by neither hook nor tie; beneath it was a plain tunic of a
dark colour. In the fifth century Pope Celestinus disapproved of this
costume, which caused the followers of Christ to be confounded with
the Stoic philosophers. In the sixth century the laity had abandoned
the Roman style of costume, and wore short dresses, copied from
those of the barbarians who had become the rulers of Gaul; but the
Church, careful of the dignity of its ministers, refused to adopt this
expensive alteration. Henceforward a broad distinction was established
between the dress of the clergy and that of the laity. The Council of
Agde (506 A.D.) ordered all clerks to wear clothes and shoes
of a peculiar cut, in conformity with their religious profession.
Two later councils forbade them the use of the Roman military cloak
(_sagum_) and of purple-coloured stuffs. Gregory the Great
forbade his household to wear any dress but the long toga, as the one
essentially appropriate to the people of the Church. This costume, with
scarcely any modification, was worn by all orthodox ecclesiastics,
through all the changes of the Middle Ages, until the seventeenth
century.
The priest, when in the exercise of his holy functions, was not
expected to make any change in his dress. Still, from the fourth to
the ninth century everything seems to show that his proper costume was
always white, or at least that it was so during the celebration of the
highest ceremonies. St. Chrysostom, feeling the approach of death, and
being anxious to partake of the holy sacrament, called for his white
vestments, and distributed those he was wearing, even to his shoes,
among his assistants. The customs and traditions of the West conformed
in this to those of the East. The neophyte was stripped of his worldly
garments, he was clad in a white or religious robe (_habitus
religionis_), and was then considered fit to perform his duties.
Sometimes, however, the white robes of the sovereign pontiff were
adorned with bands of gold or purple. White was not mixed with other
tints in the dress of the clergy till towards the ninth century; the
five hues admitted by religious symbolism date only from the twelfth
century.
[Illustration: Fig. 187.--Romanesque perforated Handbell,
representing the symbols of the Four Evangelists (Twelfth
Century).--From the Archæological Museum at Rheims.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account