Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the RenaissanceJacob, P. L.
History
Military and religious life in the Middle Ages and at the period of the Renaissance
Jacob, P. L.
Europe -- Social life and customs; Manners and customs -- History; Middle Ages; Renaissance
Amongst the heresiarchs of the first century must also be mentioned
Cerinthus the Jew, who had become a Christian, but who was looked upon
by the apostles as the corrupter of the religion of Jesus Christ. He
taught, in fact, that Jesus was not the Son of God, and that Christ,
coming down from heaven in the form of a dove, was only incorporated
in him after his baptism in the waters of Jordan. Ebion, a disciple
of Cerinthus, also denied the divinity of Christ, and was the founder
of the sect of the Ebionites. Nicholas the deacon, in his attempt to
make the law of the Gospel fit in with heathen customs, gave birth
to the heresy of the Nicolaitans, who were afterwards merged in the
Gnostics. This latter sect, to which we have already alluded, developed
enormously in the second century; and its doctrine, as well as that
of Manichæus, the originator of Manichæism--that redoubtable heresy
which sprung from the admixture of the ancient religions of India with
Christianity--constituted the basis of nearly all the heresies of the
Middle Ages.
[Illustration: Fig. 307.--Orthodoxy surrounded by the Snares of
Heresy.--Boniface Simoneta (1470 to 1500), Abbot of San Stefano
del Corno (diocese of Cremona), “calling God to his aid in order
that his work may be more efficaciously wrought, ... and desiring
above all things to speak reason and equity.”--Fac-simile of a
Wood-Engraving in the “Livre des Persécutions des Crestiens:”
Paris, Antoine Verard, gothic 4to (no date).]
The schools of philosophy of Byzantium, Antioch, and Alexandria pursued
their career of scepticism and sacrilegious discussion concerning
the divinity of Jesus Christ during the second and third centuries.
After throwing doubt upon the divine essence of the three persons of
the Trinity, others still more daring, such as Sabellius and Praxeas,
attempted to show that these three persons in God were but three
symbolic names given to the same substance. The Council of Alexandria
(261) punished these culpable errors. Soon after, an Egyptian priest
named Arius took them up and propagated them very widely, maintaining
that Jesus Christ was a created being, perfect no doubt and almost
like unto God, but not himself God. His doctrine also contained secret
heresies which were condemned by the Œcumenical Council of Nice (325).
Nevertheless this doctrine, known as Arianism, made great progress; it
was adopted and supported by several emperors, it spread throughout
Europe, and, in spite of the authority of councils, and the efforts
of popes and bishops, it seemed destined to lay the foundation of
a new Christianity in which the divinity of Christ was to find no
place. But the most radical attack upon Christianity was undoubtedly
the conspiracy of divergent sects under the leadership of the Emperor
Julian (331–362), surnamed the Apostate because he abjured the
Christian faith with the view of re-establishing paganism. His plan
for arriving at this result was very skilfully conceived.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account