Millions from WasteTalbot, Frederick Arthur Ambrose
Philosophy
Millions from Waste
Talbot, Frederick Arthur Ambrose
Salvage (Waste, etc.); Waste products
But when we come to the treatment of this material we fail miserably.
At the central station the solid matter, in reality a mud or sludge,
is separated from the free liquid. The disposal of the latter offers
little or no difficulty. It can be rendered innocuous, and is therefore
permitted to resume its part in the scheme of Nature. But the sludge:
that is a different proposition. A few figures concerning the situation
in regard to London may prove illuminating. Certainly they will serve
to demonstrate the magnitude of the volume of this waste. During the
year over 100,000,000,000 million gallons of sewage are received
from approximately 5,350,000 people occupying 95,000 acres. Each
million gallons of sewage yields about 25 tons of sludge. The total
quantity of solid matter is approximately 200,000 tons. It costs about
30s.--$7.50--to treat and dispose of each million gallons of raw
sewage.
The total yield of sludge exceeds 2,600,000 tons a year. It is an
incubus having no ostensible commercial value, so is transferred
to vessels to be carried out to sea where it is thrown overboard.
Seeing that it costs about £17 13s.--$88--to run each vessel out
and back again, and that some 111,000 journeys are made during the
year, dumping the sludge costs the ratepayers of London nearly
£2,000,000--$10,000,000--a year. The crime incidental to London is
repeated throughout the country, and in this way, as Sir William
Crookes pointed out, the nation is deliberately discarding 16,000,000
tons of valuable nitrogenous material which, were it subject to proper
treatment, might be reclaimed to participate in the nourishment of our
broad acres. Estimating the value of this potential fertilizing agent
at the modest figure of one ¹⁄₂d.--1 cent--per pound we are, of malice
aforethought, throwing away a round £35,000,000--$175,000,000--per
annum. But this is not the most disturbing feature. For the most part
the sludge, and in the case of seaside towns the crude sewage, is
discharged upon potential valuable fishing grounds, to the destruction
or infection of the fish, especially shell-fish. Furthermore, one must
not imagine because the objectionable and dangerous refuse is abandoned
well out to sea its serious dangers are removed. Tides and currents
play strange tricks, the result being that much of this filth is thrown
back upon the coasts, perhaps at a distant point, to wreak possible
havoc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive