Cadastres -- United States; Mineral resources conservation -- United States
In restoring corners of irregular claims, such as metes and bounds
placers, the broken boundary (non-riparian) or the Grant Boundary method
should be used. It may also be applied to lode claims if the above
methods do not give adequate results.
In reestablishing corners of a block of claims, the rules of
proportionate measurement may be applied. In Figure 8, missing Corner
No. 2 of claims E, F, G and H can be restored by double proportion.
Missing Corner No. 1 of claims A and B may also be restored by double
proportion; since there is no corner beyond this corner, the record
distance from Corner No. 2 would have to be used in this direction.
Corner No. 1 might also be established at the record bearing and
distance from Corner No. 2, or lines 1–2 of claims A and B could be made
parallel and of equal length to line 3–4 of claim A. Since missing
Corner No. 3 of claims B and D is on an end line, single proportionate
measurement might be considered. See the Manual of Surveying
Instructions for proportionate methods, pp. 134–136.
=6–2= Township Resurveys with Mineral Surveys: Prior to field work, all
unpatented mineral surveys embracing claims that have been declared null
and void should be cancelled, leaving only valid existing claims and
patents to be segregated. Restoration of missing corners should only be
made where they are necessary to control the boundaries between private
and public land, including the boundaries between public land and
unpatented valid mineral surveys. Segregation surveys of unsurveyed
mining claims may be requested to accommodate administrative actions. If
possible, the owners of the mining claims should be advised of the
resurvey and given an opportunity to express their opinions as to the
position of missing corners.
=6–3= Mineral Segregation Surveys: Sections 7–39 to 7–44 inclusive, of
the Manual of Surveying Instructions adequately covers this subject.
Segregation surveys are not undertaken unless there is a need for them
arising from administrative action involving the adjoining land. Very
often it will be necessary to make the survey within the boundaries as
they are marked on the ground due to inaccuracies in the location
survey. The early township surveys in California often segregated
unsurveyed mining claims showing them on the township plats without
supporting field notes. Resurveys of such segregations may be required
based on the evidence found in the field.
=6–4= Supplemental Plats: When supplemental plats are required
segregating mineral surveys, all such surveys must be segregated. Again,
it is desirable that mineral surveys embracing invalid claims be
cancelled. The need to lot a cancelled mineral survey will also require
a supplemental plat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account