Minerals in rock sections : $b The practical methods of identifying minerals in rock sections with the microscope, especially arranged for students in technical and scientific schoolsLuquer, Lea McIlvaine
Science
Minerals in rock sections : $b The practical methods of identifying minerals in rock sections with the microscope, especially arranged for students in technical and scientific schools
Luquer, Lea McIlvaine
Petrology -- Laboratory manuals
Oligoclase, _n_(NaAlSi_{3}O_{8}) + CaAl_{2}Si_{2}O_{8}, or _n_ Ab + An,
_n_ = 2 to 6.
Labradorite, NaAlSi_{3}O_{8} + _n_(CaAl_{2}Si_{2}O_{8}), or Ab + _n_ An,
_n_ = 1, 2 or 3.
Anorthite, CaAl_{2}Si_{2}O_{8}.
▄Usual Appearance in Sections▄: Much the same as orthoclase.
Lath-shaped[106] forms and microlites very common, especially in the
acid series.
[Illustration:
FIG. 70.—Plagioclase, showing narrow lamellæ, in diabase. (From
Cohen.)
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 71.—Plagioclase, showing broad lamellæ, in gabbro. (From Cohen.)
]
_Twinning._—Polysynthetic, after _Albite_ law, almost universal; the
twinning appearing between crossed nicols as a series of dark and light
bands, bounded by parallel edges, Figs. 70 and 71. The twin lamellæ are
parallel to brachy pinacoid (010), hence not observed in sections
parallel to this pinacoid. The lamellæ may appear irregular and
interrupted, and seem to be broader in the basic than in the acid
series. When this twinning fails, however, as in the basic plagioclases
in certain metamorphic rocks, the determination becomes very difficult.
In some cases polysynthetic twinning, after both _Albite_ and
_Pericline_ laws, may take place at the same time, giving rise to a
structure somewhat similar to that of microcline, Fig. 72. In addition
the polysynthetic crystals may be twinned like orthoclase after
_Carlsbad_ and _Baveno_ laws.
The general characters are the same as in orthoclase with the following
differences:
_Indices of Refraction_: _n′_ = 1.535 (α = 1.532, γ = 1.540) Albite.
_n′_ = 1.541 (α = 1.537, γ = 1.545)
Oligoclase, Ab_{4}An_{1}.
_n′_ = 1.559 (α = 1.555. γ = 1.563)
Labradorite, Ab_{1}An_{1}.
_n′_ = 1.582 (α = 1.575, γ = 1.588) Anorthite.
The surface of anorthite appears slightly rougher than that of
orthoclase.
_Cleavages_, parallel to base (001) and brachy pinacoid (010), never
intersect at right angles, as is the case in sections of orthoclase
parallel to [_=b_] axis. This is due to the triclinic system of
crystallization, but the divergence from a right angle is small (93° 36′
to 94° 10′).
[Illustration:
FIG. 72.—Plagioclase, showing crossed lamellæ, in olivine-gabbro.
(From Cohen.)
]
_Inclusions_ at times may be quite important, as the vitreous inclusions
of oligoclase in andesites, etc., and the iron ore inclusions and other
microlites in labradorite. The arrangement of these inclusions may be
zonal or in parallel orientation.
_Double refraction_ is a little stronger than for orthoclase (γ − α =
0.008 to 0.013 (anorthite)), hence producing slightly brighter
interference colors in sections of the same thickness.
_Extinction_ takes place in all sections unsymmetrically with respect to
crystallographic, twinning or cleavage lines (as these minerals are
triclinic); hence extinction angles are always observed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account