Minerals in rock sections : $b The practical methods of identifying minerals in rock sections with the microscope, especially arranged for students in technical and scientific schoolsLuquer, Lea McIlvaine
Science
Minerals in rock sections : $b The practical methods of identifying minerals in rock sections with the microscope, especially arranged for students in technical and scientific schools
Luquer, Lea McIlvaine
Petrology -- Laboratory manuals
_▄Convergent Light▄_: All plagioclases show the emergence of a
bisectrix,[107] more or less oblique, on brachy pinacoid (010) cleavage
faces. These cleavage faces show no twin lamellæ, unless twinning after
_Pericline_ law occurs, in which case the determination is much more
complicated. The axial angle is large, 2_E_ = 155° (Albite). Optical
character, depending on variety, (+) or (−).
▄Alteration▄: Partly the same as in orthoclase, forming clay, muscovite,
etc. Calcite and epidote are more common as side-products, and
zeolitization also occurs in some rocks. The plagioclases decompose more
easily than orthoclase.
▄Distinguished from▄:
(_a_) ORTHOCLASE.—By repeated twinning after _Albite_ law, giving
between crossed nicols a series of alternate dark and light bands.
When _Albite_ twinning is absent the distinction is very difficult.
(_b_) MICROCLINE.—By common absence of the microcline “_gridiron_”
structure between crossed nicols.
Methods for Optical Determination of the Plagioclases.[108]
The correct determination of the particular plagioclase is of the
greatest importance in the classification of rocks, and it is no longer
sufficient to simply determine the feldspar as either orthoclase or
plagioclase.
A quantitative analysis of isolated material would lead most surely to
the desired result, but has many objections.
Modern optical methods now permit of a very accurate and convenient
determination under ordinary circumstances. But of course these methods
involve a knowledge of the approximate orientation of the section
tested. When this section is not a definite cleavage fragment, its
orientation can best be determined by convergent light tests.
Only an outline of these methods can be here given, and reference should
be made to more complete works for an elaborate discussion of the
subject.
It is very convenient to have at hand a set of glass models of the
plagioclases, showing location of plane of optic axes, vibration
directions and crystal axes.[109]
(1) _Schuster’s_ method of recognizing the different feldspars by
extinction angles measured on the cleavage plates[110] is very precise,
but not always applicable for crystals in rock sections.
EXTINCTION ANGLES:
EXTINCTION ANGLES:
ON BASE, MEASURED FROM TRACE OF ON BRACHY PINACOID, MEASURED FROM
PINACOIDAL CLEAVAGE. TRACE OF BASAL CLEAVAGE.
Albite + 4° Albite +19½°
Oligoclase, Ab_{4}An_{1} + 2° Oligoclase, Ab_{4}An_{1} + 8°
Labradorite, Ab_{1}An_{1} − 5½° Labradorite, Ab_{1}An_{1} −20°
Anorthite −36½° Anorthite −41½°
Confusion may here arise between albite and labradorite if disregard be
had to signs, but the more acid oligoclase is readily distinguished from
the basic anorthite.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account