In the same MS. is a version of the poem on Archbishop
Williams (p. 69). Most readings are bad, but the following are
noteworthy:
4 concorporate one.
11 And vindicate whate'er.
55 when happier ages (which of late
The viper cherish'd) with unpartial fate."
]
* * *
* * * * *
POEMS
AND
TRANSLATIONS.
BY
_THOMAS STANLEY_ Esquire.
_Quæ mea culpa tamen, nisi si lusisse vocari
Culpa potest: nisi culpa potest & amasse, vocari?_
Tout vient a poinct qui peut attendre.
Printed for the Author, and his Friends, 1647.
POEMS,
BY
_THOMAS STANLEY_ ESQUIRE.
_Quæ mea culpa tamen, nisi si lusisse vocari
Culpa potest: nisi culpa potest & amasse, vocari?_
[Illustration]
Printed in the Year,
1651.
INTRODUCTION TO THOMAS STANLEY
Thomas Stanley, poet, scholar, translator, and historian of
philosophy, occupies a position in literary history, and in the
general knowledge of fairly instructed people, which is less
unenviable than that of Cleveland, almost equally curious, but more
distinctly accidental. In a way--in more ways than one--he cannot be
said to be exactly unknown. Everybody who has received the once usual
'liberal education', if not directly acquainted with his work on
classical literature, has seen his _History of Philosophy_ referred to
in later histories; and his notes on Aeschylus quoted, and sometimes
fought over, in later editions. His translations have attained a place
in that private-adventure Valhalla of English translations--Bohn's
Library. A few at least of his poems are in all or most of the
anthologies. Not many writers have such an anchor with four flukes,
lodged in the general memory, as this. And yet there are probably few
people who have any very distinct knowledge or idea of his work as a
whole; his _Poems_ (until a time subsequent to the original promise of
them in this Collection) had never been issued since his own day save
in one of the few-copied reprints of the indefatigable Sir Egerton
Brydges; and he makes small figure in most literary histories.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account