Until, when Charles shall be composed in dust,
Perfumed with epithets of good and just,
HE saved, incenséd Heaven may have forgot
T' afford one act of mercy to a Scot,
Unless that Scot deny himself and do
(What's easier far) renounce his Nation too.
[_The Scots' Apostasy_ was first printed as a
broadside in _1646_, and assigned at the time to Cleveland by
Thomas Old. It was included in _1651_, but not admitted by the
'Vindicators' in _1677_. But it is in all the central group of
editions except _Cleaveland Revived_, where absence is usually
a strong proof of genuineness; and it is extremely like him.
Mr. Berdan has admitted it, and so do I. Professor Case has
noted a catalogue entry of _The Scot's Constancy, an answer to
J. C's._ [_al._ Or an Answer to Cleveland's] _Scots' Apostasy_
(G. R. Bastick) [_al._ Robin Bostock], London April 1647. The
'J. C's' is of course pertinent.]
[Line: 2 John Campbell (1598-1633), from 1620 Baron Loudoun
in his wife's right, was, after taking a violent part on the
Covenant side in the earlier Scotch-English war, instrumental
in concluding peace; and was made in 1641 Chancellor of
Scotland and Earl of Loudoun.]
[Line: 4 as] 'and' _1653_.]
[Line: 9 'imposture' _1651_, _1653_.]
[Line: 20 The celebrated and grisly collection of Scottish
monarchs in Holyrood was not yet in existence; for its
imaginative creator only painted it in 1684, and there are
106, not sixty. But the remoteness of Scottish pedigrees was
popularly known: and if it be not true that all Scottish kings
were murdered, not a few had been.]
[Line: 24 'Assassination' is valued at six syllables.]
[Line: 28 'to' _1651_, &c.: 'into' _1646_.]
[Line: 31 Till] and tell _1646_, _1651_.]
[Line: 34 'count you' _1646_, _1651_, _1653_, &c.: 'be your'
_1687_. This prayer, at any rate, was heard pretty soon.]
[Line: 38 'steps' _1651_, &c.: 'ships' _1646_.]
[Line: 42 'go', misprinted 'to' in _1653_, &c.]
[Lines: 67-8 Not in _1646_.]
Rupertismus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account