5. In two other Copies of these Inscriptions; the first of _pag. 104._ is read, Σεπτίμιον Αἰράνην Ὀδαινάθου, and not Ὀδαινόθου as in the first Copy, and perhaps ought rather to be Ὀδαίναθον, as being the Inscription under a Statue of the same _Odænathus_, who is here, as well as on his Tomb, stiled _Illustrissimus Patricius_, but without a Date. 6. ΥΠΟ ΙΑΡΙΒΩΛΟΥ ΘΕΟΥ (_pag. 101._ & 109.) It cannot well be doubted but that this _Deus Jaribolus_ is the same with what _Gruter_ (_pag._ 86.) and _Spon_ (in the first of his Inscriptions) reads ΑΓΛΙΒΩΛΩ. By the Figure of the Idol extant in _Spon_, it appears that this God was made with the Moon upon his Shoulders, and consequently was the _Deus Lunus_ worshipped by the _Syrians_, whose Name, in the Language of that Country, could not be better expressed than by _Jarehbol_ ירה ביעל _Dominus Lunus_. Whence I am induced to believe, that _Gruter_ mistook it ΑΓΛΙΒΩΛΩ for ΑΓΑΙΒΩΛΩ, the Ι in the beginning, and the lower part of the round stroke of the Ρ, being effaced, so as to pass for Γ. I have taken care to have the Stone purposely viewed, as also to get from thence the exact Figure of the _Syrian_ or _Palmyrene_ Characters thereon, wherein there is an irreconcilable difference between _Spon_ and _Gruter_. By the help of these, compared with two others taken at _Palmyra_, which I have by me, (they being all very near the same Date,) I hope we may be able, one Day, to make out the _Palmyrene_ Alphabet: But it were to be wish'd our Travellers had transcribed them with more Curiosity, and taken more of them. By the way, it is remarkable, that the Person who dedicated this Monument, in _Gruter_ and _Spon_, is stiled Λ. ΑΥΡ. ΗΛΙΟΔΩΡΟΣ: and the same Name occurs in a broken Inscription which Mr. _Hallifax_ omitted in his Letter to Dr. _Bernard_, as being too imperfect. It stood on the right Hand of the entrance to the little Temple described _pag. 110._ and was thus, ΛΟΥΚΙΟΥ ΑΥΡΗ[ΛΙ]ΟΥ ..... ΗΛΙΟΔΩΡΟΥ ΤΟΥ. And after a Blank of three lines all worn out except one single Ο, there followed, [ΤΕΙ]ΜΗΣ ΧΑΡΙΝ ΕΤΟΥΣ....... ΜΗΝΟΣ [ΑΠ]ΕΛΛΑΙ[ΟΥ]. And that imperfect one in _pag. 104._ seems to have relation to the same Name. 7. _Pag. 111._ ΜΑΛΕΝΤΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΓΡΙΠΠΑΝ _lege_ ΜΑΛΗΝ ΤΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΓΡΙΠΠΑΝ, it being written ΜΑΛΗΝΤΟΝ, with Η in the two other Copies I have seen, whereby the Sence is cleared.