1. That the more ancient of these Inscriptions dated before the Year 500, do no where make use of _Roman Prænomina_, which yet are very frequent in them that follow; particularly _Julius_, _Aurelius_ and _Septimius_, taken up by these People out of Respect to the Emperors that bore those Names; and consequently that _Septimius Odænathus_ (the Inscription of whose Tomb we have, _pag. 91._) was most probably the same who was afterwards _Augustus_. That Name growing in use in the Reign of _Septimius Severus_, under whom or his Son _Caracalla_ this _Odænathus_ was certainly Born. And this Monument being erected by him whilst he was yet a private Man; and he afterwards attaining the Imperial Dignity, it was necessary the Inscription of his Tomb (which perhaps was that single one that was all of Marble) should be changed: Upon which occasion this Stone might be brought back into the Town, and after its Destruction, be clapt up casually over the little Gate-way where now it stands. 2. _Pag. 100._ ΚΑΤΕΛΘΟΝΤΕΣ ΕΙΣ ΟΛΟΓΕΣΙΑΔΑ ΕΝΠΟΡΟΙΑΝ ΕΣΤΗΣΑΝ: _Descendentes Vologesiada Commercium stabiliverunt, Anno_ 558, _sive Anno Christi_ 247. Whereby it appears, that this People having had their Trade interrupted by the Wars between the _Romans_ and the _Persians_, under _Gordian_; did now send an Embassy to the Court of _Sapores_ King of the _Persians_, to get it re-established; which succeeded according to their Desires. _Vologesias_ was a City built by _Vologeses_ King of the _Parthians_ in the time of _Nero_, on the _Euphrates_ below _Babylon_. _Ptolemy_ calls it Οὐολογεσιάς; _Stephanus_, Βολογεσιὰς; _Ammianus_ _Vologessia_; and _Pliny_ lib. 6. _Vologesocirta_. 3. _Pag. 101._ ΚΑΙ ΟΥΚΟΝΙΣΩΝΑ ΦΕΙΔΗΣΑΝΤΑ ΧΡΗΜΑΤΩΝ. I submit it to the Judgment of the Criticks, whether this faulty Place may not be amended by reading it ΟΥΚ ΟΙΚΕΙΩΝ ΑΦΕΙΔΗΣΑΝΤΑ, _&c._ as likewise whether ΔΙΣΜΑΛΚΟΥ in the same Inscription may not be instead of ΜΑΛΛΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΛΚΟΥ, which is the Ingenious Conjecture of that excellent Grammarian Mr. _William Baxter_.