Truth talked and not lived, rolls on the human heart a stone; consigns sensibility to the charnel-house of sen- suality, ease, self-love, self-justification, there to moulder and rot. [30] [Page 294.] The noblest work of God is man in the image of his [1] Maker; the last infirmity of evil is so-called man, swayed by the maëlstrom of human passions, elbowing the con- cepts of his own creating, making place for himself and displacing his fellows. [5] A real Christian Scientist is a marvel, a miracle in the universe of mortal mind. With selfless love, he inscribes on the heart of humanity and transcribes on the page of reality the living, palpable presence—the might and majesty!—of goodness. He lives for all mankind, and [10] honors his creator. The _vice versa_ of this man is sometimes called a man, but he is a small animal: a hived bee, with sting ready for each kind touch, he makes honey out of the flowers of human hearts and hides it in his cell of [15] ingratitude. O friendly hand! keep back thy offerings from asps and apes, from wolves in sheep’s clothing and all raven- ing beasts. Love such specimens of mortality just enough to reform and transform them,—if it be possible,— [20] and then, look out for their stings, and jaws, and claws; but thank God and take courage,—that you desire to help even such as these. Comparison to English Barmaids Since my residence in Concord, N. H., I have read [25] the daily paper, and had become an admirer of Edgar L. Wakeman’s terse, graphic, and poetic style in his “Wanderings,” richly flavored with the true ideas of humanity and equality. In an issue of January 17, how- [Page 295.] ever, were certain references to American women which [1] deserve and elicit brief comment. Mr. Wakeman writes from London, that a noted Eng- lish leader, whom he quotes without naming, avers that the “cursed barmaid system” in England is evolved by [5] the same power which in America leads women “along a gamut of isms and ists, from female suffrage, past a score of reforms, to Christian Science.” This anony- mous talker further declares, that the central cause of this “same original evil” is “a female passion for some [10] manner of notoriety.” Is Mr. Wakeman _awake_, and caught napping? While praising the Scotchman’s national pride and affection, has our American correspondent lost these sentiments from his own breast? Has he forgotten how to honor [15] his native land and defend the dignity of her daughters with his ready pen and pathos?