There are many advantages in puppets. They never argue. They have no
crude views about art. They have no private lives. We are never
bothered by accounts of their virtues, or bored by recitals of their
vices; and when they are out of an engagement they never do good in
public or save people from drowning, nor do they speak more than is set
down for them. They recognise the presiding intellect of the dramatist,
and have never been known to ask for their parts to be written up. They
are admirably docile, and have no personalities at all. I saw lately, in
Paris, a performance by certain puppets of Shakespeare's Tempest, in M.
Maurice Boucher's translation. Miranda was the mirage of Miranda,
because an artist has so fashioned her; and Ariel was true Ariel, because
so had she been made. Their gestures were quite sufficient, and the
words that seemed to come from their little lips were spoken by poets who
had beautiful voices. It was a delightful performance, and I remember it
still with delight, though Miranda took no notice of the flowers I sent
her after the curtain fell. For modern plays, however, perhaps we had
better have living players, for in modern plays actuality is everything.
The charm--the ineffable charm--of the unreal is here denied us, and
rightly.
Suffer me one more correction. Your writer describes the author of the
brilliant fantastic lecture on 'The Modern Actor' as a protege of mine.
Allow me to state that my acquaintance with Mr. John Gray is, I regret to
say, extremely recent, and that I sought it because he had already a
perfected mode of expression both in prose and verse. All artists in
this vulgar age need protection certainly. Perhaps they have always
needed it. But the nineteenth-century artist finds it not in Prince, or
Pope, or Patron, but in high indifference of temper, in the pleasure of
the creation of beautiful things, and the long contemplation of them, in
disdain of what in life is common and ignoble and in such felicitous
sense of humour as enables one to see how vain and foolish is all popular
opinion, and popular judgment, upon the wonderful things of art. These
qualities Mr. John Gray possesses in a marked degree. He needs no other
protection, nor, indeed, would he accept it.--I remain, Sir, your
obedient servant, OSCAR WILDE.
LADY WINDERMERE'S FAN: AN EXPLANATION
(St. James's Gazette, February 27, 1892.)
To the Editor of the St. James's Gazette.
SIR,--Allow me to correct a statement put forward in your issue of this
evening to the effect that I have made a certain alteration in my play in
consequence of the criticism of some journalists who write very
recklessly and very foolishly in the papers about dramatic art. This
statement is entirely untrue and grossly ridiculous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account