Miscellanies : $b embracing Nature, addresses, and lecturesEmerson, Ralph Waldo
Philosophy
Miscellanies : $b embracing Nature, addresses, and lectures
Emerson, Ralph Waldo
American essays -- 19th century; Philosophy of nature; Transcendentalism (New England)
its own; if not into a picture, a statue, or a dance,--why, then, into a
trade, an art, a science, a mode of living, a conversation, a character,
an influence. You admire pictures, but it is as impossible for you to
paint a right picture, as for grass to bear apples. But when the genius
comes, it makes fingers: it is pliancy, and the power of transferring
the affair in the street into oils and colors. Raphael must be born, and
Salvator must be born.
There is no attractiveness like that of a new man. The sleepy nations
are occupied with their political routine. England, France and America
read Parliamentary Debates, which no high genius now enlivens; and
nobody will read them who trusts his own eye: only they who are deceived
by the popular repetition of distinguished names. But when Napoleon
unrolls his map, the eye is commanded by original power. When Chatham
leads the debate, men may well listen, because they must listen. A man,
a personal ascendency is the only great phenomenon. When nature has work
to be done, she creates a genius to do it. Follow the great man, and you
shall see what the world has at heart in these ages. There is no omen
like that.
But what strikes us in the fine genius is that which belongs of right to
every one. A man should know himself for a necessary actor. A link was
wanting between two craving parts of nature, and he was hurled into
being as the bridge over that yawning need, the mediator betwixt two
else unmarriageable facts. His two parents held each of one of the
wants, and the union of foreign constitutions in him enables him to do
gladly and gracefully what the assembled human race could not have
sufficed to do. He knows his materials; he applies himself to his work;
he cannot read, or think, or look, but he unites the hitherto separated
strands into a perfect cord. The thoughts he delights to utter are the
reason of his incarnation? Is it for him to account himself cheap and
superfluous, or to linger by the wayside for opportunities? Did he not
come into being because something must be done which he and no other is
and does? If only he _sees_, the world will be visible enough. He need
not study where to stand, nor to put things in favorable lights; in him
is the light, from him all things are illuminated to their centre. What
patron shall he ask for employment and reward? Hereto was he born, to
deliver the thought of his heart from the universe to the universe, to
do an office which nature could not forego, nor he be discharged from
rendering, and then immerge again into the holy silence and eternity
out of which as a man he arose. God is rich, and many more men than one
he harbors in his bosom, biding their time and the needs and the beauty
of all. Is not this the theory of every man’s genius or faculty? Why
then goest thou as some Boswell or listening worshipper to this saint or
to that? That is the only lese-majesty. Here art thou with whom so long
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account