Mississippi Outlaws and the Detectives: Don Pedro and the Detectives; Poisoner and the DetectivesPinkerton, Allan
History
Mississippi Outlaws and the Detectives: Don Pedro and the Detectives; Poisoner and the Detectives
Pinkerton, Allan
Detective and mystery stories; Detectives
round, plump hands, though powerful enough to strangle him, left only
slight marks of abrasion on the skin, and in a few minutes all was over.
His property was at her mercy, and she gave no thought to the body of
her victim until she had seized every piece of valuable paper in his
possession.
But her position was a dangerous one, and, on cooling off somewhat, she
saw that something must be done to remove any appearance of foul play.
How could it be done most effectually? Manifestly by giving no apparent
ground for suspecting that she had any object in his death; and no
course would be more effectual than to leave such an amount of property
in his possession as to make strangers believe that none of it had been
taken. It may well be imagined that this was her hardest task; for to
give up money was probably a greater hardship for her than for some
people to give up life. Still, it would never do to run the risk of
being accused of murder; so, reluctantly, she placed one bond in his
pocket, and, by accident, included with it one-half of the torn bond,
the other half being placed under his head, in the boot from which it
was taken. She then undressed the body, placed it naturally in bed, and
went out to look for "her Billy," her paramour and panderer in vice.
This was the history of the crime, as pictured by the prosecution; and
all her actions since that fatal night had been in harmony with such a
theory. Her allegations of intimacy with young Trafton were unsupported,
save by the testimony of this William Simpson, her paramour. It was
noticeable that, while this man had testified in the trial for larceny
that he had overheard Mr. Trafton's acknowledgment of being the father
of Mrs. Sanford's child, in the murder trial he was not asked to give
any such testimony, nor was the existence of such a child even hinted at
by the defense. The counsel for Mrs. Sanford were well aware that she
had never had a child, and that this fact could be proven if necessary.
On discovering, too, that Jack Ingham was a Pinkerton detective, instead
of Mrs. Sanford's best friend, they saw other reasons why it would not
be advisable to cause Mr. William Simpson to perjure himself again.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account