But in a few points Fichte did not agree with Pestalozzi. One is in
regard to the position of reading and writing in the education of
the masses: Pestalozzi cherished, so thought Fichte, too innocent a
belief in the tradition of ages, in that he set up these two as though
they were the end and goal of instruction, when, in fact, they have
hitherto been the very instruments to enwrap men in the mist and the
shadow of learned ignorance, and to make them over-intelligent. They
take men away from the immediate perception to the mere symbol, from
the concentration of mind to its diffusion. Instruction in letters and
words, therefore, is not only unessential for the education of the
people at large, but even harmful.
In the second place, Fichte did not quite agree with Pestalozzi in the
method of sense-education. The Pestalozzian idea of the A. B. C. of
perception is a praiseworthy one, but it cannot be attained through
words. Fichte asks: “How can a child obtain the knowledge of his body
without having first learned to use it?” According to Fichte’s theory
of knowledge, self-activity precedes every content of consciousness,
and the vague feeling or sensation of this primordial, subjective
activity is the first beginning of our knowledge. Consequently,
“the true foundation of instruction and knowledge must be, to use
the Pestalozzian expression, the A. B. C. of sensation” (3: p.
407). The child is to learn to clearly perceive and distinguish the
various sensations which he experiences, and to express them, each in
distinction from others. Impressions at first produce a chaos in the
infant, but by learning to discriminate them he comes to perceive the
objects impressed upon him: thus from the A. B. C. of sensation he is
led to the A. B. C. of perception. Language should not be imparted
from outside as a mere symbol, but should develop in the child as
the progressively differentiating expression of his inner self or
subjective experience. In this way knowledge and speech become living
things and parts of the child’s own being.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account