Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since ComteGunn, John Alexander
Philosophy
Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since Comte
Gunn, John Alexander
Philosophy, French; Philosophy, Modern
This method of approaching the problem of God is, he
thinks, both simple and grand. It is a noble contrast to the scholastic
edifice built up on the metaphysical perfection of being, called the
Absolute. In this conception all attributes of personality are replaced
by an accumulation of metaphysical properties, contradictory in
themselves and quite incompatible with one another. This Absolute is a
pure chimerical abstraction; its pure being and pure essence are
equivalent to pure nothing or pure nonsense.
The fetish of pure substance, substantial cause, absolute being,
whatever it be called, is vicious at all times, but particularly when
we are dealing with the fundamental problems of science. It would be
advisable here that the only method of investigation be that of
atheism, for scientific investigation should not be tainted by any
prejudices or preconceived ideas upon the nature of the divinity.
What really is Atheism? The answer to this query, says Renouvier, is
clear. The idea of God is essentially a product of the moral law or
conscience. An atheist is, strictly speaking, one who does not admit
the reality of this moral order of ends and of persons as valuable in
themselves. Verily, he himself may personally lead a much more upright
life than the loud champions of theism, but he denies the general moral
order, which is God. With the epithet of atheist as commonly used for
those who merelv have a conception of God which differs from the
orthodox view, we are not here concerned. That may be dismissed as a
misuse of the word due to religious bigotry. The fruits of true atheism
are materialism, pantheism and fatalism. Indeed any doctrine, even a
theological doctrine, which debases and destroys the inherent value of
the human consciousness and personality, is rightly to be regarded,
whatever it may _say_ about God, however it may repeat his name (and
two of these doctrines are very fond of this repetition, but this must
not blind us to the real issue)—that doctrine is atheistic. The most
resolute materialists, the most high-minded worshippers of Providence
and the great philosophers of the Absolute, find themselves united here
in atheism. God is not a mere totality of laws operating in the
universe. Such a theism is but a form of real atheism. We must, insists
Renouvier, abandon views of this type, with all that savours of an
Absolute, a Perfect Infinite, and affirm our belief in the existence of
an order of Goodness which gives value to human personality and assures
ultimate victory to Justice. This is to believe in God. We arrive at
this belief rationally and after consideration of the world and of the
moral law of persons. Through these we come to God. We do not begin
with him and pretend to deduce these from his nature by some
incomprehensible _a priori_ propositions. The methods of the old
dogmatic theology are reversed. Instead of beginning with a Being of
whom we know nothing and can obviously deduce nothing, let us proceed
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account