Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since ComteGunn, John Alexander
Philosophy
Modern French Philosophy: a Study of the Development Since Comte
Gunn, John Alexander
Philosophy, French; Philosophy, Modern
Briefly, it follows that the hope of a world-religion is an illusion,
whether it be the dream of a perfect and world-wide Judaism, Buddhism,
Christianity, or Mohammedanism. The sole authority in religious
matters, that of the individual conscience, prevents any such
consummation, which, even if it could be achieved, would be
mischievous. The future will display a variety of beliefs and
religions, as it does now. This need not discourage us, for therein is
a sign of vitality or spiritual life, of which the world-religions are
examples, marred, however, by their profession of universality, an
ideal which they do not and never will realise.
The notion of a Catholic Church or a great world- religion is really
contrary to the duty of personal thought and reflection, which must
inevitably (unless they give way to mere lazy repetition of other
people’s thoughts) lead to differences. The tendency is for humanity to
move away from dogmatic religion, with its pretensions to universality,
catholicity, and monarchy (of which, says Guyau, the most curious type
has just recently been achieved in our own day, by the Pope’s
proclamation of the dogma of papal infallibility), towards religious
individualism and to a plurality of religions. There may, of course, be
religious associations or federations, but these will be free, and will
not demand the adherence to any dogma as such.
With the decay of dogmatic religion the best elements of religious life
will have freer scope to develop themselves, and will grow both in
intensity and in extent. “He alone is religious, in the philosophical
sense of the word, who researches for, who thinks about, who loves,
truth.” Such inquiry or search involves freedom, it involves conflict,
but the conflict of ideas, which is perfectly compatible with
toleration in a political sense, and is the essence of the spirit of
the great world teachers. This is what Jesus foresaw when he remarked:
“I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” More fully, he might have
put it, Guyau suggests: “I came not to bring peace into human thought,
but an incessant battle of ideas; not repose, but movement and progress
of spirit; not universal dogma, but liberty of belief, which is the
first condition of growth.” Well might Renan remark that it was loyalty
to such a spirit which caused him to break with the Church.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account