The evidence in favour of either is at the present day abundant;
the two chief authorities on the subject, Schmidt and Polites, both
acknowledge this; and, in my own experience, I should have difficulty
in saying which view of the Callicantzari I have the more frequently
heard expressed. On the mainland they are most commonly demons; in the
islands of the Aegean, more usually human. But in a matter of this kind
it would be of no value to count heads; even if the whole population of
Greece could be polled on the question, the view of the majority would
have no more value than that of the minority. The issue must be decided
on other than numerical grounds.
And clearly the first consideration which suggests itself must be the
nature of the earliest evidence on the subject. The earliest authority
then is Leo Allatius[566], and his statement is in brief as follows.
Children born in the octave of Christmas are seized with a kind of
madness; they rage to and fro with incredible swiftness; and their
nails grow sharp like talons. To any wayfarer whom they meet they put
the question ‘Tow or lead?’ If he answer ‘tow,’ he escapes unhurt; if
he answer ‘lead,’ they crush him with all their power and leave him
half-dead, lacerated by their talons.
Thus far the testimony of Leo Allatius distinctly favours the belief
that Callicantzari are human and not demoniacal in origin; but at the
same time it must be admitted that his statement was probably founded
upon the particular traditions of his native island only and carries
therefore less weight. The barbarous custom however which he next
proceeds to describe is of some importance. He states that children
born during the dangerous period between Christmas and New Year had
the soles of their feet scorched until the nails were singed and so
they could not become Callicantzari. Now there is a small but obvious
inconsistency in this statement. Persons who scratch one another use,
presumably, not their toe-nails but their finger-nails; and animals
likewise employ the fore feet and not the hind feet. To scorch the feet
therefore, and particularly the soles of the feet, is not a logical
method of preventing the growth of talons. But on the other hand the
treatment adopted might well be supposed to prevent the development
of hoofs, such as in many parts of Greece the Callicantzari are still
believed to have. In other words, the custom which Leo Allatius
describes was not properly understood in his time. But a custom
which has ceased to be properly understood and has had an inaccurate
interpretation set upon it is necessarily of considerable age. Already
therefore in the first half of the seventeenth century the custom which
Allatius describes was of some antiquity; and the belief that children
turn into Callicantzari, which is implied alike by the original meaning
and by the later interpretation of the custom, was equally ancient. In
Chios then at any rate the human origin of Callicantzari is a very old
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account