Modern literature: a novel, Volume 3 (of 3)Bisset, Robert
General
Modern literature: a novel, Volume 3 (of 3)
Bisset, Robert
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century -- Fiction
Hamilton, admiring the genius which beamed through this excentricity
of pernicious inculcation, sought the acquaintance of Jemima, and was
received with great complacency. She saw he was not yet a convert to
her doctrines, or to those of her friends, Topsiturvy and St. Leon;
she hoped that her philosophy would at length prevail over his present
prejudices, that he might become a powerful cooperator in the grand
work of _transmogrifying_ human nature; and she judged him peculiarly
qualified for the conversion of women. Ever since Jemima undertook
to form a new sect, she, in imitation of Whitfield, the coalheaver,
and other _pattern makers_, held private meetings to discuss with the
pupils the symptoms of conversion, their progress in the new faith,
and the probability of complete proselytism. Though a woman presided
at these assemblies, they did not resemble the secrecy and mystery
of the Bona Dea of ancient Rome, to whose festivals no male creature
was suffered to enter; and where a Clodius must disguise himself in a
woman’s habit before he could be admitted. To be received into Jemima’s
meetings, a Clodius need only avow his proper character, than which
none could be better fitted for the practical extension of Jemima’s
doctrines. To one of these meetings our hero received an invitation.
He found a considerable number of guests, but chiefly females. Jemima,
having unfortunately forgotten that an assembly was held at a tavern,
to deliberate _after_ dinner upon politics and philosophy, the last
subject not to begin till after the _sixteenth_ round of toasts, and
that some of her particular friends must be of the party, had fewer
visitors than usual. The first quarter of an hour shewed no kind
of revolution in manners and customs, being occupied by the fair
attendants in the same way as if they had been at church before the
service began, that is, in critical remarks on the bonnets, cloaks,
and handkerchiefs of each other; the dress, face, and figure of the
men. Under the two last heads our hero received great commendation.
One lady that was near him declared, in an audible whisper, that he
was an Adonis, Apollo, and Hercules, in one; “but then,” said another
lady, “he is married;” “married!” replied the first, with great
contempt, “you, a disciple of Jemima, and a votary of St. Leon, talk
of marriage! Marriage is a shameful aristocratical monopoly. Why should
so charming a man be _engrossed_?”--“Pray do not talk so loud, Madam,”
said the other. “There again,” said the first, “you forget the precepts
of the adorable Jemima, and the divine St. Leon, that in converse
between the sexes nothing is more unbecoming than secrecy.” “You
yourself,” said a third, “forget the precepts of our great instructors;
you used the term divine, a sound without meaning.”--“I stand
corrected; but the language of old prejudice and darkness will intrude
insensibly into new philosophy and light.” The second lady, observing a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account