Modern literature: a novel, Volume 3 (of 3)Bisset, Robert
General
Modern literature: a novel, Volume 3 (of 3)
Bisset, Robert
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century -- Fiction
boarding-schools, to learn what is to them useless, and not to learn
what is to them useful. These pupils becoming totally unfit for the
absurdity of marriage, and chaste converse, thereby become fit for
concubinage, unchaste converse, and the promiscuous intercourse which
St. Leon so strongly recommends by precept; and I am proud to say, I
still more strongly recommend by both precept and example. It would be
tedious, at present, to go over twenty-four; and the more so, as so
many in this age of increasing light, have such claims, as it might be
difficult to adjust with a due regard to equity and merit. One person,
however, I must mention. Mrs. Sonnet, though not supreme in ability,
yet has an activity and good will in the cause, that entitles her to
high consideration. All her novels have proposed to decry existing
institutions, exalt the philosophers of France, and to debase what
is called female virtue, by an attempt to shew that it depends on
accident, and not principle. Mrs. Egotist also, though not strictly
one of our votaries, yet tends to promote our interests. With great
skill and ingenuity she softens what the unenlightened call adultery,
by stiling it ‘the error of too susceptible a heart;’ also by holding
forth disobedient children as objects of praise and admiration, she
advances our favourite doctrine of the absurdity of filial duty:
most of her heroes and heroines uniformly and steadily pursue, that
rule of conduct which their parents strongly exhort them to avoid.
Thus friendly to the dissolution of domestic authority, and what the
blind call duties, Mrs. Egotist is no less ardent to decry civil,
ecclesiastical, and political authority, to represent Bishops, and
rulers of every kind as wicked, and most vehemently to reprobate the
execrable and abominable constitution, which we are obliged to suffer
in Britain. Yes, Charlotte, according to the new polity of Jemima,
you must have a mitre. There is a copartnery of either one or two
old ladies, and a young one for writing novels, neither of them are
professedly my votaries, and, indeed, are _professedly_ the contrary.
But there is one most inveterate foe of the new philosophy, known
by the name of Common Sense, and till he can be destroyed, the new
philosophy will never be fully established. Miss Twostools can bring
every page of her works, and her mother about seven-eighths of hers,
to bear witness of their hostility to Common Sense. Admirable in that
view is the story of an old Lord, who supposes himself to have a wolf
in his belly; no less admirable the many adventures of his grandson,
who, to be fitted for the peerage, was committed to the care of the
clerk of the parish, and met so many marvellous adventures as never
did, or could happen to any human being. Mrs. and Miss Twostools are
both too weak for the mitre; but for their good-will may be appointed
_bell-women_ to the cause.” Jemima ran over many other names, such
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account