Modern shipbuilding and the men engaged in itPollock, David
History
Modern shipbuilding and the men engaged in it
Pollock, David
Shipbuilding -- Great Britain
For the most recent advances made in this important branch of the
science of naval architecture, the profession lies under indebtedness
chiefly to one or two naval architects of eminent ability, whose
professional province for a time has lain more especially in the way
of a full consideration of the subject. Sir E. J. Reed, while Chief
Constructor of the Navy, and under him several Government-trained
naval architects subsequently acquiring high positions, achieved
much in accurate investigation of iron-clad vessels of war. In
1870 the authority named read an elaborate paper before the Royal
Society dealing at length with such work.[28] In 1874 Mr William
John, formerly under Sir E. J. Reed, but at that time Assistant
Chief Surveyor to Lloyd’s Register, read a valuable paper before
the Institution of Naval Architects, in which he gave the results
of investigations of specific cases, and of long and careful study
of the general problem as concerned with merchant vessels. In this
paper, Mr John advanced the proposition that the maximum bending
moment likely to be experienced on a wave crest may be taken
approximately as one thirty-fifth of the product of the weight of the
ship into her length. Proceeding on this assumption Mr John’s paper
further gave valuable results of calculations made into the strength
of a series of vessels representing large numbers of mercantile
steamers then afloat.[29] Of this paper and the conclusions it
pointed to, Mr John, in a later paper on “Transverse and other
Strains of Ships,” said:—
“The investigations showed unmistakably that as ships increased in
size a marked diminution occurred in their longitudinal strength,
and the results caused some surprise at the time, although they
might perhaps have been easily inferred from the writings of
others published at an earlier period. Those results, in spite of
their approximate character, impressed two conclusions strongly
on my mind: firstly, that there was cause for anxiety as to the
longitudinal strength of some very large iron steamers then
afloat, and that the longitudinal strength of large ships needed on
all hands the most careful vigilance and attention; and secondly,
that in small vessels, and even vessels of moderate dimensions, the
longitudinal strength need cause but little anxiety, because it is
amply provided for by the scantlings found necessary to fulfil the
other requirements of a sea-going trade.”
Using the formula as to the maximum bending moment advanced by
Mr John many investigations have been made subsequently into the
longitudinal strength of vessels, and this increased interest in the
subject has not been without its effect on subsequent structural
practice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account