Modern ships of warReed, Edward J. (Edward James), Sir
History
Modern ships of war
Reed, Edward J. (Edward James), Sir
Navies; Warships
“The extent to which water may be introduced is a matter over which
the captain would necessarily have control. But even if the whole
of the unoccupied spaces were filled with water, the increase in
draught would not exceed fourteen to eighteen inches, and the loss
in speed would not exceed half a knot. If only the coal-bunkers
were flooded as a preliminary to action, the chance of any serious
disturbance of trim, and consequent loss of manœuvring power or
speed by damage to the light sides above the protective deck and
near the water, would be very small, and the ‘sinkage’ of the
vessel would be decreased considerably. But taking the extreme
case, with the ends completely filled and a sinkage of fourteen to
eighteen inches, a ship of the _Admiral_ class would go into action
with practically her full speed available, and with her ends so
protected by under-water deck and the water admitted above that
deck that damage to the thin sides by shot or shell penetrating
at or near the water-line would not produce changes of trim or
alterations of draught to any greater extent than would be produced
if the armor-belt had been carried to the stem and stern. Nor would
the admission of water into the ends render the vessel unstable.
“It has been urged that the sinkage due to filling the tank ends
with water is a disadvantage, because it brings the upper edge of
the belt armor in the _Admiral_ class about fourteen to eighteen
inches nearer the water than the upper edge of the belts of the
French ships. If the greatest danger of the ships was to be
measured by the smallness of their ‘reserve’ of ‘armor-protected
buoyancy’ (that is to say, by the buoyancy of the part of the ship
lying above her fighting water-line and below the belt-deck), then
the _Admiral_ class would not compare favorably with the fully
belted French ships. But I have already explained that this is not
the true measure of the greatest danger arising from the effects of
gun-fire, and that it would be a mistake to assume that in either
the French or the English ships the armor-belted portions of the
vessels guarantee their safety when damaged in action.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account