Modern ships of warReed, Edward J. (Edward James), Sir
History
Modern ships of war
Reed, Edward J. (Edward James), Sir
Navies; Warships
“First, there seems, as was previously remarked, every reason
for doubting, in the actual conditions of naval gunnery, whether
it would be possible, not merely in a few minutes, but in a
considerable time, to produce the wholesale destruction of the
unarmored parts of modern war-ships which has been assumed in
the condemnation of the _Admiral_ class. If the _Collingwood_,
or one of her successors, were simply treated as a moving target
in a sea-way for the _Amiral Duperré_ or one of her consorts,
this would be a most improbable result. But, remembering that the
_Collingwood_ would herself be delivering heavy blows in return for
those received, the chances of her disablement would necessarily
be decreased. Secondly, it does not seem at all evident that the
introduction of rapid-fire guns has such an important influence on
the question of shortened belts as some writers have supposed. So
far as machine guns are concerned, I well remember at the board
meeting which decided to approve the building of the _Collingwood_
the possible effects of machine-gun fire were discussed at some
length, both in reference to the adoption of the barbette system
and to the system of hull protection. The rapid-firing gun which
has since been introduced is now a formidable weapon; but it may
be questioned whether its effects upon the unarmored portions of
modern war-ships would be so serious as those resulting from the
shell-fire of heavier guns, and therefore it cannot with certainty
be concluded that it would be advantageous to make arrangements
for keeping out the projectiles from the rapid-firing guns now in
use at the ends of the _Admiral_ class. More especially is this
true when it is considered that already rapid-fire guns of much
larger calibre and greater power than the 6-pounder and 9-pounder
are being made. To these guns three inches of steel would be
practically no better defence than the existing thin sides, and
the real defence lies in the strong protective deck. Shell-fire
from heavier guns will probably be found the best form of attack
against the unarmored or lightly armored portions of battle-ships,
especially now that the use of steel shells with thin walls and
large bursting charges is being so rapidly developed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account