Modern ships of warReed, Edward J. (Edward James), Sir
History
Modern ships of war
Reed, Edward J. (Edward James), Sir
Navies; Warships
“Having expressed these cautions, I will go on to say that in my
opinion the main idea of your gallant correspondent, which he
has so long and so steadily developed, is nevertheless a sound
one, and one which has a great future. I do not, of course, for a
moment admit with him that the gun has yet mastered the armor. I
believe the _Dreadnought_, though of old design, would still fight
a good action against all ships now ready for sea, and have to fear
only a very exceptional, and therefore either a very skilful or
very fortunate, shot. The recent Admiralty ships, where they are
armored, are practically proof against almost every gun afloat.
Further, I have satisfied myself that if the existing restrictions
imposed upon us by the absence of floating docks adapted to receive
ships of great breadth were removed (these restrictions crippling
us to a most unfortunate degree), and if certain professional
conventionalities as to the forms of ships were set aside, it would
be perfectly practicable to build war-ships no larger and no more
costly than the _Inflexible_, with enough side-armor more than a
yard (three feet) thick to preserve their stability, and at the
same time made ram-proof and torpedo-proof. Meanwhile, of all the
vulnerable objects afloat, the recent guns themselves, by reason of
their absurdly long and slender barrels, left fully exposed to all
fire, are among the most vulnerable.
“Still, the raft-deck system has a wide field before it, and I am
quite prepared to admit that I believe in its practicability and in
its sufficient security for certain classes of vessels if properly
carried out. This it has not yet been in any single instance. Even
in the case of the great Italian ships, as in our own, there are
elements of weakness which would be fatal to the system in action,
but which are _not_ unavoidable. Allow me to assure Sir George
Elliot that I have largely and closely studied this subject, and
that my main objections to it are not objections of principle.
“If the raft-deck system is to be adopted, it must in my opinion
be carried out in a much fuller and more satisfactory manner than
hitherto, and with the aid of arrangements which I have for a long
time past seen the necessity of, and been engaged upon.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account