Modern thinkers and present problems : $b an approach to modern philosophy through its historySinger, Edgar A. (Edgar Arthur)
Philosophy
Modern thinkers and present problems : $b an approach to modern philosophy through its history
Singer, Edgar A. (Edgar Arthur)
Philosophers; Philosophy -- History
If many have been unable to keep the sweet moral confidence of
childhood until the end, it is because riper experience has not
confirmed to them Antigone’s premises, nor mature reflection born out
her conclusions. Do they _not_ die, these unwritten laws: are new ones,
indeed, never born? For a little searching we may find that not a
precept marks a virtue for one people at one time, but that elsewhere
or elsewhen its ordinance is taken to be vicious. And conversely, we do
not have to travel far to find vice turning into virtue. Antigone’s own
people are not so remote from us as the Mingrelians and Topinamboues;
we owe them much that we prize most in our culture, and would be proud
to match them in more ways than one. And yet, consider their admiration
in the way of a man, which, if it was any one, was surely the Wise
Ulysses. Now, if there are any two principles of Christian morals
more firmly planted in our souls than others, they are the maxims, Be
truthful, and, Be kind. But was Ulysses truthful? was Ulysses kind?
To leave for one’s unconquered enemies a wooden horse as it were a
parting token may be an innocent enough thing to do, however pagan. But
to make of this wooden horse a disguised troop ship is not within the
strict letter of truthfulness; and to sally forth therefrom to slay
your quondam foes while they sleep in the security of your peace does
not show a kindly spirit. Yet it does not appear that the Greek gods
resented any more than did the Greek people Ulysses’ cruel craft: all
of which would lead one to suspect that the unwritten law of peoples,
if indeed it come from Heaven, must come from only that part of it
which is directly overhead at the time.
But let time and place be never so circumscribed, and men never so in
accord as to their moral maxims, are these maxims at least consistent
with one another? Does one bid us be truthful?--then another bids us
be kind! But how in this vale of perplexities is one always to be
truthful yet never unkind? “Yes I know,” writes an old gossip of mine
and fellow philosopher, “I know. Morality; Duty. But how hard it is to
discover what is duty! I assure you that for three quarters of my time
I do not know where duty lies. It is like the hedgehog that belonged
to our English governess at Joinville. We used to spend the evening
looking for it under the furniture, and when we had found it, it was
time to go to bed.”[15]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account