Modern thinkers and present problems : $b an approach to modern philosophy through its historySinger, Edgar A. (Edgar Arthur)
Philosophy
Modern thinkers and present problems : $b an approach to modern philosophy through its history
Singer, Edgar A. (Edgar Arthur)
Philosophers; Philosophy -- History
“What is happiness? The feeling that our strength grows, that an
obstacle is overcome.
“Not contentment, but more power; not universal peace, but war; not
virtue, but forcefulness.
“The weak and ineffective must go under; first principle of _our_ love
of humanity. And one should even lend one’s hand to this end.
“What is more harmful than any vice? Pity for the condition of the
ineffectives and weak--Christianity.”
Yet one must not imagine that this pitiless struggle of which is to be
born the man of tomorrow is gloomy and hate-inspired. On the contrary
it is joyous, and gives scope for a much nobler love than that which
is pitiful. I know of no institution of modern life that so nearly
realizes Nietzsche’s idea of this struggle together with the virtues
it engenders, as does that of sport among gentlemen. Here one plays
to win, and to spare one’s opponent or to be spared by him merely mars
sport. Yet one does not hate one’s opponent, but loves him for his good
sportsmanship. Only, this love, this friendship among strong men must
not weaken the arm, must not soften the will; if it do, it destroys
itself and is returned with contempt. We do not hate men because we
fear them, Nietzsche makes it out, but just because we do not fear
them. The hatred that leads one to shun one’s kind is born of disdain.
Life that has for its joy the joy of battle, for its reward the sense
of strength that grows with its exercise, for its delight the love of
brother warriors, a brother that can give and take death generously! It
is only the many too many, weakly looking on and trembling before the
spectacle of a strength they fear and hate, that have no joy of life
and cry, “Let there be peace.”
* * * * *
I would willingly describe this Homeric scene more in detail, consider
the part that certain heroes, the warrior, the artist, the philosopher,
play in it. But we must sweep on to larger issues, for there is a
question that must have occurred to everyone as our description of the
Nietzschian battle has advanced. It is the old question, Cui bono! We
fight, suppose we win? Little Peterkin, who was surely brought up on
Schopenhauer, is there to ask, What good has come of it? A little power
more or less, what does it matter? Our brief hour is still a brief
hour, our atomic selves cannot greatly swell, what after all is the use
of fighting when we cannot befool ourselves as to the nature of the
spoils?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account