Monopolies -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
than for carrying one-tenth of that distance, where there is no
competition. When they have the power, and hold the shipper at their
mercy, they virtually rob him. What is true of their course where there
is no competition, will become the universal rule, when a perfect
consolidation of the whole railroad interest is effected. Add to this
the control of the finances of the country (which they are now rapidly
securing) and their rule becomes absolute over the whole people, and all
departments of the government. If the reader has followed us thus far,
he will have observed that the corporate interest of the country has
assumed a position in antagonism to the people; that it has a secure
hold upon the industrial and financial interests, and that, to a great
extent, it already controls the action of the legislative and executive
departments of the government, state and national.
CHAPTER XXII.
THE SUPREME BENCH INVADED--ITS DECISIONS REVIEWED.
We are aware that many look upon the final decisions of courts with a
degree of awe and respect which is almost reverential. The railroad
companies of the country, with all their paid attorneys, are now
extremely jealous in their efforts to convince the public that the
supreme court of the United States is a body of the greatest jurists the
world ever produced; that their decisions are pre-eminently able, and
that it is disloyal, if not rank treason, to call them in question, or
to even criticise them. While we feel bound to recognize the decisions
of courts as binding until they are reversed, we claim that it is not
only the right, but the duty of every citizen of the republic to examine
these decisions, and to approve or condemn, as to his judgment shall
seem right. We examine, and approve or condemn, acts of congress and
state legislatures; we discuss the motives of legislators, and when acts
have been passed which are not acceptable, their repeal has been
demanded. Not unfrequently repeals have been effected soon after their
enactment, either because of patent defects, or because the people
condemned them. History has proven that the election of a man to
congress, or to the legislature, does not clothe him with wisdom, not
always with honesty, but that the frailties of humanity affected him as
it did others. The same rule applies to courts and judges. They are made
of the same flesh and blood, and are subject to the same infirmities as
other men. Their knowledge is not perfect; their judgment is not
infallible, nor are their official decisions always pure and free from
bias. Instances are not wanting where judges have been impeached, and
removed for dishonest practices. They have been and still are being
influenced by popular feeling, by certain interests, and are always
more or less controlled by education and association. Their decisions
are often reversed, and they sometimes reverse their own decisions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account