The government officials and most of the British military
officers therefore attended the Anglican services, while the
fur lords and the traders, those of St. Gabriel’s church. The
newspapers took sides. The Gazette followed the government
party, while the Courant and the Herald voiced the views of
the dissentients. In 1825 the Herald was bought by Archibald
Ferguson, a rich merchant of Montreal, for the express purpose
of upholding the rights of the Presbyterian church to a share in
the clergy reserves, on the ground that the Scottish Church in
Canada should be considered as much an established church as that
of the Anglicans. Eventually it gradually came to be recognized
in the courts that there were three “established” churches in
Canada, the Anglicans, the Scottish and the Catholics.[1] But
the increasing number of non-conformist bodies arising could
not brook this, and so the old opposition against the “clergy
reserves” was renewed and it was not till 1854 that this long
burning question was settled by total diversion of the reserves
from all religious purposes.
We may now return to the story of the Constitutional struggles
again about to commence and in which Montreal was to take a
leading part.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] The historical development of the churches of Montreal is
specially treated in the second part of this volume.
CHAPTER XV
BUREAURACY vs. DEMOCRACY
THE PROPOSED UNION OF THE CANADAS
REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT--MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS--FRENCH-CANADIANS
AIM TO STRENGTHEN THEIR POLITICAL POWER--THE “COLONIAL” OFFICE
AND THE BUREAUCRATIC CLASS VERSUS THE DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATIVE
ASSEMBLY--L. J. PAPINEAU AND JOHN RICHARDSON--PETITIONS FOR
AND AGAINST UNION--THE MONTREAL BRITISH PETITION OF 1822--THE
ANSWER OF L.J. PAPINEAU--THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL--THE BILL FOR
UNION WITHDRAWN. NOTES: NAMES OF JUSTICES OF THE PEACE FROM
1796 TO 1833--MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR MONTREAL
DISTRICT, 1791-1829--PETITION OF MONTREAL BRITISH--1822.
The new Constitution of 1791 was honestly framed with the desire
of giving a measure of representative government, but it was
used, before long, by an oligarchy of the bureaucratic classes to
whom the governors were victims. In Lower Canada the bureaucratic
party opposed the French-Canadians and many of those of British
origin. Furthermore there was added the development of a race
enmity which ended so disastrously in the uprising of the
“patriots” in 1837. The political situation was tense for half a
century. The fight for mastery was between the legislative and
executive council appointed by the Governor, and the legislative
assemblies elected by the people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account