In the pursuit of his education Judge Curran attended a Jesuit
school and St. Mary’s College at Montreal, where he entered upon
a classical course. He afterward became a student in St. Joseph’s
College at Ottawa and in 1891 the University of Ottawa conferred
upon him the LL. D. degree. In the continuance of his education,
he entered McGill University as a student in the law department
and won his D. C. L. degree in 1862. It was in the spring of 1859
that he began preparation for the bar, reading at times under
the direction of such distinguished lawyers as Bernard Devlin,
Hon. T. J. J. Loranger and Andrew Robertson, K. C. While pursuing
his classical courses he cultivated a taste for literature and
oratory and in his student days developed the natural gifts that
in course of time made him one of the foremost Canadian orators.
It was also in his early manhood that he joined the Irish
national movement and thus his life was taking shape along those
lines which were to make him a power in moulding the history of
province and country.
The year following his graduation from McGill, or in 1863, he was
called to the bar of Quebec. No dreary novitiate awaited him.
Almost immediately his talents won him recognition and he gained
prominence as one of the younger members of the profession, by
the important part which he took in the conduct of a number of
notable criminal cases, including the Shehan, Havern, Kehoe and
Considine murder cases and the Dunbar, Brown, Kearney and T. F.
O’Brien frauds.
It is said that he had no superior in the conduct of election
cases. He was successful in the Devlin-Ryan, Tansey-Malone and
the James McShane-Loprairie contests and all these drew to
him the attention and favorable comment of the profession. He
was equally capable in the practice of civil law and was the
legal representative of some of the largest contractors of the
continent including men prominent in business in New York, Ottawa
and Montreal. His legal counsel was sought by men of prominence
again and again. Probably his last appearance as an advocate was
when he represented the Dominion government in an arbitration
with the province, the case being heard in the city of Quebec
about 1894.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account