Moral Theology: A Complete Course Based on St. Thomas Aquinas and the Best Modern AuthoritiesCallan, Charles J. (Charles Jerome)
Religion
Moral Theology: A Complete Course Based on St. Thomas Aquinas and the Best Modern Authorities
Callan, Charles J. (Charles Jerome)
Christian ethics -- Catholic authors
(a) One must know that one’s belief is opposed to divine revelation
or to Catholic faith. Hence, those who were born and brought up in
Protestantism, and who in good faith accept the confession of their
denomination, are not formal but material heretics. Even those who
are ignorant of their errors through grave fault and who hold to them
firmly, are guilty, not of formal heresy, but of sinful ignorance (see
904 sqq.)
(b) One must willingly consent to the error. But for formal heresy it
is not required that a person give his assent out of malice, or that
he continue in obstinate rejection for a long time, or that he refuse
to heed admonitions given him. Pertinacity here means true consent
to recognized error, and this can proceed from weakness (e.g., from
anger or other passion); it can be given in an instant, and does not
presuppose an admonition disregarded. Hence, if one sees the truth
of the Catholic Church, but fears that assent will involve many
obligations and out of weakness turns away from the truth, one then and
there pertinaciously consents to error.
830. Examples of material heresy are: (a) Catholics who deny certain
dogmas of faith, because they have not been well instructed, but who
are ready to correct their errors, whenever the Church’s teaching is
brought home to them; (b) non-Catholics who do not accept the Catholic
Church, but who have never had any misgivings about the tenets of their
own denomination, or who in doubts have searched for the truth to the
best of their ability.
831. The sinfulness of heresy is as follows: (a) formal heresy is a
grave sin, as was said above regarding unbelief in general (see 819;
Tit., iii. 10); (b) material heresy is no sin at all, if the ignorance
is invincible; it is a grave or a venial sin, according to the amount
of negligence, if the ignorance is vincible.
832. Circumstances of the sin of heresy are of various kinds. (a)
Circumstances that change the species. Most theologians hold that
the particular article denied, or the particular sect adhered to,
does not constitute a particular species of heresy, and hence that
in confession it suffices for one to accuse oneself generically of
heresy. (b) Circumstances that aggravate the sin. The facts that heresy
is external, that it is manifested to a large number, that it is
joined with apostasy and adhesion to an heretical sect, etc., increase
the accidental malice of this sin. (c) Circumstances that multiply
the number of sins. It seems that when several articles or defined
truths are denied at the same time, so many numerically distinct sins
are committed (see 219). Example: Titus says: “I do not accept the
Resurrection, either of Christ or of the dead.” The act is one, but two
sins are committed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account